Research Article

The tale of words and power: Institutional narratives in Southeast Europe

Todor Stojčevski 1 * , Urša Lamut 1 2 , Erika Džajić Uršič 1 2
More Detail
1 School of Advanced Social Studies, Nova Gorica, SLOVENIA2 Rudolfovo–Science and Technology Center Novo Mesto, Novo Mesto, SLOVENIA* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 16(1), January 2026, e202604, https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/17738
Published: 14 January 2026
OPEN ACCESS   742 Views   190 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The article examines how institutional frameworks influence communication strategies and public engagement across six countries in Southeastern Europe. Findings from focus group discussions reveal that formalized communication rules enhance credibility and consistency, but hinder adaptability, especially when engaging younger audiences who prefer informal and visual communication styles. Communicator literacy fosters clarity, trust, and audience connection, including adapting language and employing rhetorical and emotional intelligence. Leadership amplifies the perceived authority of institutional messages, increasing public responsiveness. Regional complexities, such as multilingual requirements for national minorities, highlight the tension between inclusivity and efficiency. Grounded in the social-fields-approach, the article emphasizes the interplay between institutional structures, sociocultural contexts, and public opinion formation. Institutions must adopt adaptive and inclusive strategies to effectively engage diverse publics and foster trust.
Keywords: media, communication, institutions, Southeast Europe, public opinion

CITATION (APA)

Stojčevski, T., Lamut, U., & Džajić Uršič, E. (2026). The tale of words and power: Institutional narratives in Southeast Europe. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 16(1), e202604. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/17738

REFERENCES

  1. 2024 World Population Review. (2024). Southern European countries 2024. World Population Review. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/southern-european-countries
  2. Abdullah, K., & Benny, G. (2013). Regional public opinion towards the formation of political security community in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 6(4), 650-665. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajsr.2013.650.665
  3. Albion Gould. (2023). A brief history of arts and crafts in Romania. Albion Gould. https://albiongould.com/a-brief-history-of-arts-and-crafts-in-romania/
  4. Allen, C. F. (1999). Power, identity and Eurocentrism in health promotion: The case of Trinidad and Tobago [PhD thesis, University of Warwick].
  5. Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087315
  6. Ballinger, P. (1999). Definitional dilemmas: Southeastern Europe as “culture area”? Balkanologie, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/balkanologie.745
  7. Banisch, S., Araújo, T., & Louçã, J. (2010). Opinion dynamics and communication networks. Advances in Complex Systems, 13(01), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525910002438
  8. Barnlund, D. C. (2008). A transactional model of communication. In Communication theory (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  9. Barzun, J., & Mayne, R. J. (2025). Political and cultural influences on the economy. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-Europe/Political-and-cultural-influences-on-the-economy
  10. Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press.
  11. Beckert, J. (1999). Economic action and embeddedness: The problem of the structure of action. CCOP. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6jc6f1q6
  12. Beckert, J. (2009). The social order of markets. Theory and Society, 38, 245-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9082-0
  13. Beckert, J. (2010). How do fields change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets, 31(5), 605-627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610372184
  14. Bell, D. (2001). The coming of post-industrial society. In D. B. Grusky (Ed.), Social stratification, class, race, and gender in sociological perspective. Routledge.
  15. Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001
  16. Berentsen, W. H., & Poulsen, T. (2025). Religions of Europe. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/place/Europe/Religions
  17. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday & Company.
  18. Biesta, G. J. J. (1998). Mead, intersubjectivity, and education: The early writings. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 17(2), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005029131211
  19. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2002). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  20. Bourdieu, P. (1998). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford University Press.
  21. Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy (1st ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
  22. Bourdieu, P. (2008). Outline of a theory of practice. In S. Seidman (Ed.), The new social theory reader (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv120qr2d.16
  23. Carey, J. W. (1992). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Psychology Press.
  24. Čeginskas, V. L. A., Kaasik-Krogerus, S., Lähdesmäki, T., & Mäkinen, K. (2021). Constructing social Europe through European cultural heritage. European Societies, 23(4), 487-512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2021.1913508
  25. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
  26. Cull, N. J. (2010). The Cold War and the United States Information Agency: American propaganda and public diplomacy, 1945-1989. Cold War History. https://www.academia.edu/86160260/The_Cold_War_and_the_United_States_Information_Agency_American_propaganda_and_public_diplomacy_1945_1989
  27. Darnton, R. (1982). The literary underground of the old regime. Harvard University Press.
  28. Davison, W. P. (2024a). Mass media and social media. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/public-opinion/Mass-media-and-social-media
  29. Davison, W. P. (2024b). The Middle Ages to the early modern period. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/public-opinion/The-Middle-Ages-to-the-early-modern-period
  30. DiMaggio, P. (1979). On Pierre Bourdieu. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6). https://doi.org/10.1086/226948
  31. Doudaki, V., & Filimonov, K. (2024). An integrative literature review on democracy and media in Europe: Theory driven re-analysis of existing empirical data (MeDeMAP deliverable 2.3). EU Open Research Repository. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11526382
  32. Durkheim, E. (2023). The rules of sociological method. In W. Longhofer, & D. Winchester (Eds.), Social theory re-wired (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320609-3
  33. Džajić Uršič, E. (2019). Morphogenesis of industrial symbiotic networks. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b16330
  34. Eisenstein, E. L. (2005). The printing revolution in early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819230
  35. European Commission. (2024). Cultural heritage in regional policy–Culture and creativity. European Commission. https://culture.ec.europa.eu/cultural-heritage/cultural-heritage-in-eu-policies/cultural-heritage-in-regional-policy
  36. Fligstein, N. (1999). Fields, power and social skill: A critical analysis of the new institutionalisms. CCOP. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/89m770dv
  37. Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00132
  38. Fligstein, N. (2008). Euroclash: The EU, European identity, and the future of Europe. Oxford University Press.
  39. Fruscione, G. (2020). The Balkans: Old, new instabilities: A European region looking for its place in the world. ISPI.
  40. Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception and experiments with “trust” as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction (pp. 187–238). Ronald Press.
  41. Getha-Taylor, H., Grayer, M., Kempf, R., & O’Leary, R. (2018). Collaborating in the absence of trust? What collaborative governance theory and practice can learn from the literatures of conflict resolution, psychology, and law. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018773089
  42. Giddens, A. (1990). Modernity and self-identity. Stanford University Press.
  43. Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.
  44. Giddens, A. (1994). Risk, trust, reflexivity. Cambridge University Press.
  45. Giddens, A. (2023). Modernity and self-identity. In W. Longhofer, & D. Winchester (Eds.), Social theory re-wired (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320609-62
  46. Gobel, M. S., Benet-Martinez, V., Mesquita, B., & Uskul, A. K. (2018). Europe’s culture(s): Negotiating cultural meanings, values, and identities in the European context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(6), 858-867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118779144
  47. Grosjean, P. (2011). The institutional legacy of the Ottoman Empire: Islamic rule and financial development in South Eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2010.05.003
  48. Gvozdanović, A., & Stanojević, D. (2024). The origins of the youth’s political trust in Southeastern Europe. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2024.2378546
  49. Hilgers, M., & Mangez, E. (2014). Introduction to Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of social fields. In M. Hilgers, & E. Mangez (Eds.), Bourdieu’s theory of social fields. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315772493
  50. Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy’s fourth wave?: Digital media and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936953.001.0001
  51. Jhaver, S., Boylston, C., Yang, D., & Bruckman, A. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of deplatforming as a moderation strategy on Twitter. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1-30). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479525
  52. Kantar, P. (2024). Citizen participatory focus groups on meaningful & ethical communications. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/32390
  53. Koković, D. (2007). Društvo i medijski izazovi: Uvod u sociologiju masovnih komunikacija [Society and media challenges: Introduction to the sociology of mass communications]. COBISS. https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/sr/sr/bib/227701767
  54. Krstić, N., Dinić, J., & Gavrilović, D. (2018). Religiosity and informal economic practices in Southeastern European societies. Religions, 9(10), Article 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9100295
  55. Krzemiński, I. (2019). Solidarity: The unfulfilled project of Polish democracy. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b16065
  56. Lee, W., Yang, S.-G., & Kim, B. J. (2022). The effect of media on opinion formation. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 595, Article 127075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127075
  57. Mamchii, O. (2024). 10 largest empires in history that changed the world. Best Diplomats. Retrieved February 5, 2025, from https://bestdiplomats.org/largest-empires-in-history/
  58. Mankoff, J. (2022). Empires of Eurasia: How imperial legacies shape international security. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2c3k1xd
  59. Massey, Z. B., & Miller, C. H. (2018). Case studies on interethnic conflict: A theoretical integration. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 66, 130-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.04.006
  60. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind self and society. University of Chicago Press.
  61. Mead, G. H. (1981). Selected writings: George Herbert Mead. University of Chicago Press.
  62. Mead, G. H., Joas, H., Huebner, D. R., & Morris, W. M. (2015). Mind, self, and society: The definitive edition. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226112879.001.0001
  63. Milutinović, P. (2022). Digital public policy and e-governance as factors of the enhanced socio-economic cohesion in the European Union. Kultura Polisa, 19(4), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2022.19.4r.146m
  64. Mullett, M. A. (2023). The Catholic reformation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003399506
  65. New World Encyclopedia. (2025). Eastern Europe. New World Encyclopedia. https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Eastern_Europe
  66. Ott, B. L. (2017). The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
  67. Painter, J. (2000). Pierre Bourdieu. In M. Crang, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Thinking space. Routledge.
  68. Palmisano, F., & Sacchi, A. (2024). Trust in public institutions, inequality, and digital interaction: Empirical evidence from European Union countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 79, Article 103582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2023.103582
  69. Pettigrew, A. M. (1972). Information control as a power resource. Sociology, 6(2), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857200600202
  70. Pitsoe, V., & Letseka, M. (2013). Foucault’s discourse and power: Implications for instructionist classroom management. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.31005
  71. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
  72. Rončević, B., Modic, D., & Golob, T. (2022). Social-fields-approach (SOFIA) to research on social change: Innovations as social fields. COBISS. https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/si/sl/bib/92751619
  73. Schramm, W. (1997). The beginnings of communication study in America: A personal memoir. SAGE.
  74. Soundy Unwin, P., Unwin, G., & Tucker, D. H. (2025). Era of the Industrial Revolution. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/publishing/Era-of-the-Industrial-Revolution
  75. Steinberg, S. (2007). An introduction to communication studies. Juta and Company Ltd.
  76. Štětka, V., Mazák, J., & Vochocová, L. (2021). “Nobody tells us what to write about”: The disinformation media ecosystem and its consumers in the Czech Republic. Javnost–The Public, 28(1), 90-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2020.1841381
  77. Stewart, K., & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: The use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 395-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056916
  78. Stojarová, V. (2020). Media in the Western Balkans: Who controls the past controls the future. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 20(1), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2020.1702620
  79. Stojčevski, T., Lamut, U., & Uršič, E. D. (2024). Understanding public opinion formation in Southeast Europe: Exploring social forces and communication dynamics. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(4), Article e202455. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15171
  80. Taylor, P. M. (2013). Munitions of the mind. Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781847790927
  81. Terchila, S. (2025). External communication in the public and private sectors of the European Union. Impact on business owners, clients, and communities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence (pp. 4429-4442). Sciendo. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2025-0339
  82. The European Newsroom. (2022). The European media landscape. The European Newsroom. https://europeannewsroom.com/about/medialandscape/
  83. Trajkoska, Ž. (2024). Measuring politically harmful narratives. SHET-NA. https://respublica.edu.mk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/shtet-na_prv-izveshtaj-kratka-verzija.pdf
  84. Trošt, T., & Mandić, D. (2017). Changing youth values in Southeast Europe: Beyond ethnicity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315111049
  85. Tutnjević, S., & Savić, M. (2019). Usvajanje jezika: Uvod u razvojnu psiholingvistiku [Language acquisition: An introduction to developmental psycholinguistics]. COBISS. https://plus.cobiss.net/cobiss/bh/bs/bib/7994648
  86. Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408
  87. Valič, T. B., Kolar, J., Lamut, U., & Jurak, A. P. (2023). Key policy mechanisms supporting the University-Industry collaboration in the Danube region: Case study of academic HPC centres and SMEs. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 32(5), 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-09-2022-0283
  88. Vrăbiescu, I. (2018). Ethnic minorities and politics in post-socialist Southeastern Europe. Comparative Southeast European Studies, 66(4), 599-601. https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2018-0045
  89. Wafiq, N. F. (2023). The power of social media: Shaping political discourse in the digital age. Modern Diplomacy. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/05/11/the-power-of-social-media-shaping-political-discourse-in-the-digital-age/
  90. Waisbord, S. (2018). The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics. Communication Research and Practice, 4(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1428928
  91. Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking (vol. 27). Council of Europe.
  92. Ward-Perkins, B. (2005). The end of the Roman Empire. History Today, 55(6).
  93. Windley, B. F., & Berentsen, W. H. (2025). Southern Europe. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/place/Europe/Southern-Europe
  94. World Economic Forum. (2024). Global risks report 2024. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2024/
  95. Xiong, F., & Liu, Y. (2014). Opinion formation on social media: An empirical approach. Chaos, 24, Article 013130. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866011
  96. Yun, S. (2011). Chinese public opinion: Shaping China’s foreign policy, or shaped by it? Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinese-public-opinion-shaping-chinas-foreign-policy-or-shaped-by-it/
  97. Zhu, H., & Hu, B. (2018). Impact of information on public opinion reversal–An agent based model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 512, 578-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.085