Research Article

Socio-digital precarity: The unequal dynamics of digital fatigue in Turkey

Mehmet Tahir Karaboğa 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Social Studies Education, Faculty of Education, Mersin University, Mersin, TURKEY* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 16(4), October 2026, e202653, https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/19769
Published: 04 November 2026
OPEN ACCESS   16 Views   7 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study examines the invisible pressures created by digital technologies in everyday life and their unequal effects on individuals. Within the framework of the concept of “socio-digital precarity,” the research approaches digital fatigue not merely as a result of screen time or individual habits, but as a reflection of structural dynamics such as the neoliberal economy, the attention economy, and performance culture. This quantitative study conducted with 807 participants from seven regions of Turkey revealed that digital fatigue significantly differs by income, age, and region, with descriptive variation by gender. Individuals with low-income and those in disadvantaged regions reported higher levels of digital fatigue, while women showed slightly higher mean scores. These findings indicate that digital fatigue is not an individual issue but a social problem distributed unequally. The study proposes to reconsider digital fatigue within the framework of “fatigue justice” in media and cultural studies. It offers policymakers and scholars a new perspective for discussing the ethical boundaries of the attention economy, enhancing transparency in algorithmic design, and strengthening the digital well-being of vulnerable groups.
Keywords: digital fatigue, socio-digital precarity, attention economy, performance culture, inequality

CITATION (APA)

Karaboğa, M. T. (2026). Socio-digital precarity: The unequal dynamics of digital fatigue in Turkey. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 16(4), e202653. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/19769

REFERENCES

  1. Akbuğa, F. (2025). Dealing with social media fatigue: A focused study on Gen Z. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(53), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.1518611
  2. Almutairi, H., Alhammad, L., Aldossari, B., & Alonazi, A. (2024). Prevalence and interrelationships of screen time, visual disorders, and neck pain among university students: A cross-sectional study at Majmaah University. Healthcare, 12(20), 2067-2078. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12202067
  3. Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. Penguin Press.
  4. Balcı, Ş., & Sarıtaş, H. (2025). Sosyal medya yorgunluğu ile can sıkıntısı ve sosyal medya bağımlılığı arasındaki ilişki: Üniversite gençliği üzerine bir inceleme [The relationship between social media fatigue, boredom, and social media addiction: A study on university youth]. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 12(2), 569-597. https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1631084
  5. Becker, S. P., & Lienesch, J. (2018). Nighttime media use in adolescents with ADHD: Links to sleep problems and internalizing symptoms. Sleep Medicine, 51, 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2018.06.021
  6. Beer, D. (2019). The data gaze: Capitalism, power and perception. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526463210
  7. Bondanini, G., Giovanelli, C., Mucci, N., & Giorgi, G. (2025). The dual impact of digital connectivity: Balancing productivity and well-being in the modern workplace. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(6), 845-857. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060845
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
  9. Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300166439
  10. Castro, A. R. C., Lumanog, M. R. P., Seguiro, G. D., Tumpag, C. J. C., & Cabatac, R. T. (2025). Digital learning fatigue and students’ learning motivation: A descriptive-correlational study. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 11(5), 1057-1067. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra21825
  11. Chakravartty, P., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Global communications: Toward a transcultural political economy. Rowman & Littlefield.
  12. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
  14. Dhir, A., Yossatorn, Y., Kaur, P., & Chen, S. (2018). Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing — A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.012
  15. Espinosa Zárate, Z., Camilli Trujillo, C., & Plaza-de-la-Hoz, J. (2023). Digitalization in vulnerable populations: A systematic review in Latin America. Social Indicators Research, 170, 1183-1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03239-x
  16. Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3(3), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.64590/pup
  17. Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital labour and Karl Marx. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880075
  18. Han, B.-C. (2010). Müdigkeitsgesellschaft [Burnout society]. Matthes & Seitz Berlin
  19. Han, B.-C. (2015). The burnout society. Stanford University Press.
  20. Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2013). Digital inequality. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 129-150). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0007
  21. Jane, E. A. (2017). Misogyny online: A short (and brutish) history. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473916029
  22. Jobs for the Future. (2022). Advancing access and digital equity: Challenges and solutions. JFF. https://www.jff.org/digital-digest-equitable-digital-access/
  23. Liang, S., Ren, Z., & Yang, G. (2022). Cross-sectional and prospective association between internet addiction and risk of fatigue among Chinese college students. Medicine, 101(33), Article e30034. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030034
  24. Lindner, J. R., & Lindner, N. J. (2024). Interpreting Likert-type scales, summated scales, unidimensional scales, and attitudinal scales: I neither agree nor disagree, Likert or not. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 5(2), 152-163. https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v5i2.351
  25. Lohr, S. (2019). Sampling: Design and analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429296284
  26. Marciano, L., Ostroumova, M., Schulz, P. J., & Camerini, A.-L. (2022). Digital media use and adolescents’ mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 793868. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.793868
  27. McLean, L., & Griffiths, M. (2019). Female gamers’ experience of online harassment and social support in online gaming: A qualitative study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 970-994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9962-0
  28. McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2020). Thinking twice about sum scores. Behavior Research Methods, 52(6), 2287-2305. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01398-0
  29. Mikołajczyk, K. (2024). Digital well-being of managers in the hybrid workplace. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 60(1), 138-153. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcm-2024-0006
  30. Newport, C. (2019). Digital minimalism: Choosing a focused life in a noisy world. Portfolio.
  31. Parlak, S., Celebi Cakiroglu, O., & Oksuz Gul, F. (2021). Gender roles during COVID-19 pandemic: The experiences of Turkish female academics. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(S2), 461-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12655
  32. Pérez-Torres, V. (2024). Social media: A digital social mirror for identity development during adolescence. Current Psychology, 43(26), 22170-22180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05980-z
  33. Pew Research Center. (2021). The state of online harassment. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/01/13/the-state-of-online-harassment/
  34. Philip, L., Cottrill, C., Farrington, J., Williams, F., & Ashmore, F. (2017). The digital divide: Patterns, policy and scenarios for connecting the ‘final few’ in rural communities across Great Britain. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 386-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.002
  35. Puxiu, J., Abd.Rahim, N., & Mohd Nor, N. H. (2025). Exploring social media fatigue through WeChat use: A diary study among university students in Liaoning, China. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, 17(2), 125-139.
  36. Reinecke, L., & Oliver, M. B. (2016). Media use and well-being: Status quo and open questions. In L. Reinecke, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 3-13). Routledge.
  37. Reinecke, L., Aufenanger, S., Beutel, M. E., Dreier, M., Quiring, O., Stark, B., Wölfling, K., & Müller, K. W. (2016). Digital stress over the life span: The effects of communication load and Internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments in a German probability sample. Media Psychology, 20(1), 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1121832
  38. Robinson, L., Cotton, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2020). Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i7.10842
  39. Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Cifre, E. (2013). The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 422-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.680460
  40. Santos, E. A. C. (2025). Theses on platform capitalism and neoliberalism – Reflections on global trends from the (semi)periphery of capitalism. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 23(2), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.31269/gpz5xh58
  41. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849664554
  42. Supriyadi, T., Sulistiasih, S., Rahmi, K. H., Fahrudin, A., & Pramono, B. (2025). The impact of digital fatigue on employee productivity and well-being: A scoping literature review. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(2), Article 3420. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i2.3420
  43. Syvertsen, T. (2020). Digital detox: The politics of disconnecting. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787693395
  44. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin Books.
  45. TMYK. (2020). Türkiye meslek sınıflama sistemi [Turkish occupational classification system]. Türkiye Mesleki Yeterlilik Kurumu. https://immib.org.tr/tr/duyuru-haberler-turkiye-meslek-siniflama-sistemi-gorus-talebi-hk
  46. TÜİK. (2025). Adrese dayalı nüfus kayıt sistemi sonuçları, 2024 [Address-based population registration system results, 2024]. TÜİK. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2024-53783
  47. Tuncer, R. Z., & Levendeli, Ş. T. (2023). Bağ(ım)lı bireyden yorgun bireye: Dijital iletişim çağında sosyal ağ yorgunluğu [From dependent to exhausted: Social network fatigue in the digital age]. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi, 16(2), 479-507. https://doi.org/10.18094/JOSC.1296833
  48. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each. Basic Books/Hachette Book Group.
  49. Tutar, H., & Mutlu, H. T. (2024). Dijital yorgunluk ölçeği (DİYÖ): Geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Digital fatigue scale (DFS): Validity and reliability study]. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 67, 56-74. https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.1426571
  50. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003
  51. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, & A. Williams (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual (studies in media and communications) (pp. 29-52). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
  52. van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-5), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
  53. Wang, Q., Hong, S., Pitafi, A. H., & Hangeldiyeva, N. (2024). The dark side of enterprise social media and employee digital creativity: Communication visibility perspective. Heliyon, 10(18), Article e37756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37756
  54. Zhang, Y., Cheng, X., Ariyo, T., & Duan, W. (2025). Bedtime media use, psychological distress, and fatigue: A study of college students in Shaanxi Province, China. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1529137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1529137
  55. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.