Research Article

Multi-Word Combinations in Science Communication: A Corpus-Driven Study of University Press Releases

Emilia Petrocelli 1 * , Laura Di Ferrante 2 , Elisa Ghia 3
More Detail
1 Department of Human Studies, University for Foreigners of Siena, Siena, ITALY2 Department of Communication and Social Research, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ITALY3 Department of Political and Social Science, University of Pavia, Pavia, ITALY* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(4), October 2022, e202224, https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/12247
Published: 25 July 2022
OPEN ACCESS   2148 Views   1470 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Entrepreneurial universities sponsor their research through the media to increase their popularity. This in turn may engender a biased representation of scientific knowledge in the media. We present the results of a quali-quantitative analysis of phraseology characterizing press releases (PRs) issued by universities and focusing on published research. Our investigation aims to identify typical n-grams in university PRs and their main purposes. The study is based on a developmental 68,913-word collection of university PRs. 5-word n-grams were assigned categories and functions. Results contribute to the characterization of PRs as a hybrid genre at the crossroads between news and ads. Moreover, findings add knowledge about this specific type of PRs, which cover some of the same functions as scientific discourse while at the same time enhancing promotional features. This is shown by the recurrent use of phrasal units fulfilling both informative and promotional needs to the detriment of others only fulfilling informative functions.
Keywords: science communication, academic research, press releases, phraseology, n-grams, academic discourse

CITATION (APA)

Petrocelli, E., Di Ferrante, L., & Ghia, E. (2022). Multi-Word Combinations in Science Communication: A Corpus-Driven Study of University Press Releases. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(4), e202224. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/12247

REFERENCES

  1. Barbieri, F. (2018). I don’t want to and don’t get me wrong: Lexical bundles as a window to subjectivity and intersubjectivity in American blogs. In J. Jopaczyk & J. Tyrkkö (Eds.), Applications of pattern-driven methods in corpus linguistics (pp. 251-275). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.10bar
  2. Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. A&C Black.
  3. Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001
  4. Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
  5. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004) ‘If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks’, Applied Linguistics 25(3), 371-405. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371
  6. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education Limited.
  7. Bratton, L., Adams, R. C., Challenger, A., Boivin, J., Bott, L., Chambers, C. D., & Sumner, P. (2019). The association between exaggeration in health-related science news and academic press releases: A replication study. Wellcome Open Research, 4, 148. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15486.2
  8. Catenaccio, P. (2007). New(s) genre and discursive identity. The changing face of the press release in the age of the Internet. In G. Garzone, G. Poncini, & P. Catenaccio (Eds.), Multimodality in corporate communication. Web genres and discursive identity (pp. 55-72). Franco Angeli.
  9. Catenaccio, P. (2008). Press releases as a hybrid genre: Addressing the informative/promotional conundrum. Pragmatics, 18(1), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18.1.02cat
  10. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  11. Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002
  12. Csomay, E. (2013). Lexical bundles in discourse structure: A corpus-based study of classroom discourse. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams045
  13. De Cock, S. (1998). A recurrent word combination approach to the study of formulae in the speech of native and non-native speakers of English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 3(1), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.3.1.04dec
  14. De Cock, S., & Granger, S. (2021a). Uncovering the typical phraseology of press releases and business news reports using a lexical bundle approach. EUROPHRAS 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/259638
  15. De Cock, S., & Granger, S. (2021b). Stance in press releases versus business news: A lexical bundle approach. Text & Talk, 41(5-6), 691-713. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-0040
  16. Di Ferrante, L., Lattanzi, G., & Petrocelli, E. (2021). Those who get lost in communication science. Promotion and downplay in university press releases. In G. Garzone, W. Giordano, & S. Pizziconi (Eds.), Discursive perspectives on knowledge dissemination in corporate and professional communication: Focus on ethical and ideological aspects (pp. 31-56). Editura Politehnica.
  17. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
  18. Garzone, G. (2014). News production and scientific knowledge: Exploring popularization as a process. In G. Bongo, & G. Caliendo (Eds.), Die Sprache der Popularisierung [The language of popularization] (pp.73-107). Peter Lang.
  19. Garzone, G. (2021). Specialized communication and popularization in English. Carocci.
  20. Gotti, M. (2014). Reformulation and recontextualization in popularization discourse. Ibérica, Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos [Iberica, Journal of the European Association of Languages for Specific Purposes], 27, 15-34.
  21. Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2015). Phraseology. In D. Biber, & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 125-145). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764377.008
  22. Hyland, K. (2008a). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
  23. Hyland, K. (2008b). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.x
  24. Hyland, K. (2012). Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 150-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000037
  25. Jacobs, G. (1999). Preformulating the news: An analysis of the metapragmatics of press releases. Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.60
  26. Jacobs, G., & Van Hout, T. (2009). Towards a process view of preformulation. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 239-251). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.148.24jac
  27. Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The sketch engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1, 7-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9
  28. Lasswell, H. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas, a series of addresses (pp. 37-52). The Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
  29. Linell, P. (1998). Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text & Talk, 18(2), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143
  30. Nesi, H., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Lexical bundles and discourse signaling in academic lectures. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 283-304. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.3.04nes
  31. Partington, L. & Morley, J. (2004). From frequency to ideology: Investigating word and cluster/bundle frequency in political debate. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Practical applications in language and computers - PALC 2003 (pp. 179-192). Peter Lang.
  32. Pulido, C. M., Villarejo-Carballido, B., Redondo-Sama, G., & Gómez, A. (2020). COVID-19 infodemic: More retweets for science-based information on coronavirus than for false information. International Sociology, 35(4), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920914755
  33. Santiago, R., Carvalho, T., & Relva, R. (2008). Research and the universities’ image. European Journal of Education, 43(4), 495-512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2008.00370.x
  34. Sleurs, K., & Jacobs, G. (2005). Beyond preformulation: An ethnographic perspective on press releases. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(8), 1251-1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.11.007
  35. Strobbe, I., & Jacobs, G. (2005). E-releases: A view from linguistic pragmatics. Public Relations Review, 31(2), 289-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.02.009
  36. Stubbs, M. (2002). Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7(2), 215-244. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.7.2.04stu
  37. Sumner, P., Vivian-Griffiths, S., Boivin, J., Williams, A., Venetis, C. A., & Davies, A. (2014). The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: Retrospective observational study. BMJ, 349. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7015
  38. Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M., Casella, S. L., Kennedy, A. T., & Larson, R. J. (2009). Press releases by academic medical centers: Not so academic? Annals of Internal Medicine, 150(9), 613-618. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00007
  39. Yavchitz, A., Boutron, I., Bafeta, A., Marroun, I., Charles, P., Mantz, J., & Ravaud, P. (2012). Misrepresentation of randomized controlled trials in press releases and news coverage: A cohort study. PLOS Medicine 9(9), e1001308. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001308