Research Article

Improving critical thinking ability in elementary schools with interactive e-modules

Deden Dicky Dermawan 1 2 , Wuri Wuryandani 1 , Herwin Herwin 1 , Fivia Eliza 3 * , Istikhoroh Nurzaman 4 , Sendi Fauzi Giwangsa 4 , Nano Nurdiansah 5 , Radinal Fadli 6 , Sasmita Sari 1 7 , Miftahul Jannah 1 , Munawarah 1
More Detail
1 Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman, INDONESIA2 Universitas Islam 45, Bekasi, INDONESIA3 Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, INDONESIA4 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, INDONESIA5 Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Bandung, INDONESIA6 Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, INDONESIA7 STKIP Muhammadiyah Oku Timur, Oku Timur, INDONESIA* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(2), April 2025, e202513, https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/16051
Published Online: 25 February 2025, Published: 01 April 2025
OPEN ACCESS   8139 Views   2805 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This research project focuses on developing an interactive e-module specifically designed to improve critical thinking skills in elementary school students. To achieve this goal, we used a research and development approach based on the 4D model, involving 36 fourth-grade students at Pasirhuni State Elementary School, Indonesia as the research sample, data collection using validation sheets and tests, data analysis using expert validation questionnaires, classical completeness tests, and N-gain tests. The validation results showed high scores on the media and material aspects, with an average score of 89.40%, which indicated that this e-module was very valid, in the effectiveness test conducted on a wide scale, the pre- and post-test scores showed a percentage of classical completeness of 89% with complete criteria. The implementation of the interactive e-module resulted in a significant increase in students’ critical thinking skills. This recommendation can contribute to further research on the role of visual and interactive features in digital modules to support the development of student’s cognitive skills.
Keywords: interactive e-modules, critical thinking, elementary schools, students

CITATION (APA)

Dermawan, D. D., Wuryandani, W., Herwin, H., Eliza, F., Nurzaman, I., Giwangsa, S. F., Nurdiansah, N., Fadli, R., Sari, S., Jannah, M., & Munawarah (2025). Improving critical thinking ability in elementary schools with interactive e-modules. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(2), e202513. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/16051

REFERENCES

  1. Akihary, W., Lestuny, C., & Apituley, P. S. (2024). Schneeball-Wırbelgruppe learning model: Improving students’ concept mastery and critical thinking. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(4), 1263–1271. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21747
  2. Aliyah, S., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2023). Entrepreneurship-based biotechnology e-module development to improve critical and creative thinking skills. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 14(3), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v14i3.43299
  3. Aliyu, J., Osman, S., Kumar, J. A., & Mohd Jamil, M. R. (2023). The design and development of a learning strategy to enhance students’ engagement in simultaneous equations: An evaluation viewpoint. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), Article 36. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1691
  4. Altun, E., & Yildirim, N. (2023). What does critical thinking mean? Examination of pre-service teachers’ cognitive structures and definitions for critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, Article 101367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101367
  5. Alyusfitri, R., Gistituati, N., & Fauzan, A. (2024). The effectiveness and relationship of student responses toward learning outcomes using interactive multimedia-based e-modules in elementary schools. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 16(5), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2024.354
  6. An Le, D. T. B., & Hockey, J. (2022). Critical thinking in the higher education classroom: Knowledge, power, control and identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(1), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.2003182
  7. Antón-Sancho, Á., Fernández-Arias, P., & Vergara-Rodríguez, D. (2023). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of ICT tools in science and technology education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), Article 130. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1860
  8. Aris, N. M., Ibrahim, N. H., & Halim, N. D. A. (2025). Design and development research (DDR) approach in designing design thinking chemistry module to empower students’ innovation competencies. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 44(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.1.5568
  9. Aristin, N. F., Hastuti, K. P., Arisanty, D., Adyatma, S., & Donna, C. (2023). Effectiveness of problem-based learning models to improve learning outcomes of geography in the new normal learning era. Journal of Education and Learning, 17(4), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i4.20834
  10. Astuti, I. A. D., Dasmo, D., Nurullaeli, N., & Rangka, I. B. (2018). The impact of pocket mobile learning to improve critical thinking skills in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114, Article 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012030
  11. Barratt, M. J., Ferris, J. A., & Lenton, S. (2015). Hidden populations, online purposive sampling, and external validity: Taking off the blindfold. Field Methods, 27(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X14526838
  12. Benjakul, S. (2023). Instructional design based on constructionism for enhancing higher-order thinking skills of learners in an online learning context. Journal of Educators Online, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2023.20.3.5
  13. Booth, C. S., Song, C., Howell, M. E., Rasquinha, A., Saska, A., Helikar, R., Sikich, S. M., Couch, B. A., van Dijk, K., Roston, R. L., & Helikar, T. (2021). Teaching metabolism in upper-division undergraduate biochemistry courses using online computational systems and dynamical models improves student performance. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 20(1), Article ar13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-05-0105
  14. Bradshaw, T. (2016). A case study examining how the use of a module-specific hashtag can enhance student engagement among journalism undergraduates. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 6(Special Issue), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/5658
  15. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
  16. Charlina, C., Septyanti, E., Mustika, T. P., & Rahmi, A. (2022). Electronic module as learning needs to write exposition texts for junior high school students. Journal of Education and Learning, 16(2), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i2.20402
  17. Chen, B., Wei, L., & Li, H. (2016). Teaching complicated conceptual knowledge with simulation videos in foundational electrical engineering courses. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(3), Article 148. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.174
  18. Chimakonam, J. O., & Ogbonnaya, L. U. (2024). Can conversational thinking serve as a suitable pedagogical approach for philosophy education in African schools? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 58(2–3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhae039
  19. Dahal, N., Pant, B. P., Luitel, B. C., Khadka, J., Shrestha, I. M., Manandhar, N. K., & Rajbanshi, R. (2023). Development and evaluation of e-learning courses: Validity, practicality, and effectiveness. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(12), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i12.40317
  20. Detroyer, E., Dobbels, F., Debonnaire, D., Irving, K., Teodorczuk, A., Fick, D. M., Joosten, E., & Milisen, K. (2016). The effect of an interactive delirium e-learning tool on healthcare workers’ delirium recognition, knowledge and strain in caring for delirious patients: A pilot pre-test/post-test study. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0537-0
  21. Drigas, A., & Karyotaki, M. (2014). Learning tools and applications for cognitive improvement. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 4(3), Article 71. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3665
  22. El Soufi, N., & See, B. H. (2019). Does explicit teaching of critical thinking improve critical thinking skills of English language learners in higher education? A critical review of causal evidence. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 140–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.12.006
  23. Eliza, F., Fadli, R., Hakiki, M., Trisnawati, W., Abdulah, Putra, Y. I., Fauziah, Marind, G., & Hidayah, Y. (2023). Revolution in engineering education through Android-based learning media for mobile learning: Practicality of mobile learning media to improve electrical measuring skills in the Industrial Age 4.0. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(20), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i20.42093
  24. Eliza, F., Hakiki, M., Fadli, R., Ridoh, A., Fauziah, F., Suri, R. M., Hermanto, H., Kurniawan, J., & Hidayah, Y. (2024). Android-based mobile learning application using app inventor on computer operating system material: The development and validity study. TEM Journal, 13(1), 624–634. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM131-65
  25. Erna, M., Anwar, L., & Mazidah, M. (2021). Interactive e-module using Zoom cloud meeting platform to reduce misconceptions on salt hydrolysis material. Journal of Education and Learning, 15(2), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i2.18460
  26. Evans, D. L., & Joshi, S. V. (2020). On the validity of the Saccharum complex and the Saccharinae subtribe: A re-assessment. BioRxiv, 1957. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.29.226753
  27. Fadillah, R., Ganefri, G., Yulastri, A., Luthfi, A., Hidayat, H., Samala, A. D., & Rawas, S. (2024). Digital entrepreneurship research for learning and teaching in education: A bibliometric analysis. TEM Journal, 13(3), 1997–2011. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM133-28
  28. Fadli, R., Surjono, H. D., Sari, R. C., Wagiran, Sardi, J., Eliza, F., Habibullah, Suhardiman, S., Ridho Dedy, A. B., Ramadhani, W., Hakiki, M., & Hidayah, Y. (2024). Practicality of mobile-based learning with project-based learning approach in electric motor installation to increase student learning motivation. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(8), 1127–1135. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.8.2141
  29. Fendler, L. (2016). Ethical implications of validity-vs.-reliability trade-offs in educational research. Ethics and Education, 11(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2016.1179837
  30. Fitzpatrick, A., Andreopoulos, S., & Freedman, L. (2021). Enhancing science literacy and communication among the next generation of scientists in an online learning environment. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 49(6), 856–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21584
  31. Gaikwad, N., & Tankhiwale, S. (2014). Interactive e-learning module in pharmacology: A pilot project at a rural medical college in India. Perspectives on Medical Education, 3(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-013-0081-0
  32. Hakiki, M., Halomoan, Fadli, R., Hidayah, Y., Zunarti, R., & Yanti, V. Y. (2024). CT-mobile: Enhancing computational thinking via Android graphic design app. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(13), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i13.47711
  33. Hay, P. (2024). Creative pedagogies: School without walls and forest of imagination. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 43(3), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12512
  34. Huang, K.-L., Liu, Y.-C., & Dong, M.-Q. (2024). Incorporating AIGC into design ideation: A study on self-efficacy and learning experience acceptance under higher-order thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101508
  35. Irwansyah, F. S., Lubab, I., Farida, I., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2017). Designing interactive electronic module in chemistry lessons. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, Article 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012009
  36. Johansson, E. (2020). The assessment of higher-order thinking skills in online EFL courses: A quantitative content analysis. NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies, 19(1), 224–256. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.519
  37. Kavadella, A., Kossioni, A. E., Tsiklakis, K., Cowpe, J., Bullock, A., Barnes, E., Bailey, S., Thomas, H., Thomas, R., Karaharju-Suvanto, T., Suomalainen, K., Kersten, H., Povel, E., Giles, M., Walmsley, D., Soboleva, U., Liepa, A., & Akota, I. (2013). Recommendations for the development of e-modules for the continuing professional development of European dentists. European Journal of Dental Education, 17(SUPPL. 1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12039
  38. Kharisudin, I., & Cahyati, N. E. (2020). Problem-solving ability using mathematical modeling strategy on model eliciting activities based on mathematics self-concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(3), Article 032067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032067
  39. Kistofer, T., Permadi, G. S., & Vitadiar, T. Z. (2019). Development of digital system learning media using digital learning system. In Proceedings of the 1st Vocational Education International Conference (pp. 177–182). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.030
  40. Kowitlawakul, Y., Chan, M. F., Tan, S. S. L., Soong, A. S. K., & Chan, S. W. C. (2017). Development of an e-learning research module using multimedia instruction approach. CIN–Computers Informatics Nursing, 35(3), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000306
  41. Laaziz, Y., Chemsi, G., & Radid, M. (2023). The influence of e-assessment on students’ cognitive engagement in higher education. Engineering Pedagogy, 14(4), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8016-9
  42. Lederman, D., & Maloney, W. F. (2004). R & D and development. Science and Technology, 38.
  43. Lee, J., & Suh, S. (2024). AI technology integrated education model for empowering fashion design ideation. Sustainability, 16(17), Article 7262. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177262
  44. Lemarié, J., Castillan, L., & Eyrolle, H. (2017). Effets de l’expertise et du format de présentation multimédia sur l’exécution et le rappel d’instructions procédurales [Effects of expertise and multimedia presentation format on execution and recall of procedural instructions]. Psychologie Francaise, 62(4), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2016.07.002
  45. Lestari, S., Agung, L., & Musadad, A. (2019). Android based adventure games to enhance vocational high school students’ critical thinking skills. In Proceedings of the 1st Seminar and Workshop on Research Design, for Education, Social Science, Arts, and Humanities (pp. 3–8). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2286917
  46. Lewin, W., James, H., Mizdrak, N., Kaasa, B., Strauss, S. A., & Toguri, J. T. (2024). Pilot study: Moving towards a scalable intervention for postgraduate communication skills training. Palliative Medicine Reports, 5(1), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2024.0006
  47. Logan, R. M., Johnson, C. E., & Worsham, J. W. (2021). Development of an e-learning module to facilitate student learning and outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(2), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.10.007
  48. Lorencová, H., Jarošová, E., Avgitidou, S., & Dimitriadou, C. (2019). Critical thinking practices in teacher education programmes: A systematic review. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 844–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586331
  49. Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., & Rojas-García, P. (2024). Expected usefulness of interactive learning platforms and academic sustainability performance: The moderator role of student enjoyment. Sustainability, 16(9), Article 3630. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093630
  50. Miller, M. T., & Olthouse, J. (2013). Critical thinking in gifted children’s offline and online peer feedback. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6092
  51. Moylan, R., Code, J., & O’Brien, H. (2025). Teaching and AI in the postdigital age: Learning from teachers’ perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 153, Article 104851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104851
  52. Muda, Z., & Rashid, H. S. A. (2022). Developing interactive design for educating childhood cancer awareness. TEM Journal, 11(3), 1322–1330. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM113-42
  53. Naser-ud-Din, S. (2015). Introducing scenario based learning interactive to postgraduates in UQ orthodontic program. European Journal of Dental Education, 19(3), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12118
  54. Niyazova, A. Y., Chistyakov, A. A., Volosova, N. Y., Krokhina, J. A., Sokolova, N. L., & Chirkina, S. E. (2023). Evaluation of pre-service teachers’ digital skills and ICT competencies in context of the demands of the 21st century. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(3), Article e202337. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13355
  55. Norouzi, M., Samet, A., Sharifuddin, R. S. B., & Hamid, D. H. T. B. A. H. (2012). Investigate the effect of mobile learning over the critical thinking in higher education. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 6(6), 909–915. https://www.avicennacollege.ge/my_upload/filepdf/pdf_1662892866.pdf
  56. Olvet, D. M., & Sadigh, K. (2023). Comparing the effectiveness of asynchronous e-modules and didactic lectures to teach electrocardiogram interpretation to first year US medical students. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), Article 360. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04338-6
  57. Osman, K., & Lee, T. T. (2014). Impact of interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agents on students’ understanding and motivation in the learning of electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9407-y
  58. Radović, S., Radojičić, M., Veljković, K., & Marić, M. (2020). Examining the effects of GeoGebra applets on mathematics learning using interactive mathematics textbook. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1512001
  59. Rincón Leal, L., Vergel Ortega, M., & Paz Montes, L. S. (2019). Mobile devices for the development of critical thinking in the learning of differential equations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1408, Article 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1408/1/012015
  60. S, S., & D, A. (2024). A multi criteria decision making approach to integrate gamification in education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(IS2), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2024/v37is2/24049
  61. Sahraie, F., Rezvanfar, A., Movahedmohammadi, S. H., Ebner, M., Alambeigi, A., & Frrokhnia, M. (2024). Analysis of learners’ emotions in e-learning environments based on cognitive sciences. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(7), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i07.48471
  62. Sari Dewi, P., & Kuswanto, H. (2023). The effectiveness of the use of augmented reality-assisted physics e-module based on pedicab to improve mathematical communication and critical thinking abilities. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), Article 53. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1714
  63. Sendari, S., Ratnaningrum, R. D., Ningrum, M. L., Rahmawati, Y., Rahmawati, H., Matsumoto, T., & Rachman, I. (2019). Developing e-module of environmental health for gaining environmental hygiene awareness. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 245, Article 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/245/1/012023
  64. Serrano Cardona, L., & Muñoz Mata, E. (2018). Analysis of the relationship between school heads’ leadership, problem solving and critical thinking skills. Early Human Development, 83(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.05.022
  65. Seruni, R., Munawaroh, S., Kurniadewi, F., & Nurjayadi, M. (2020). Implementation of e-module flip PDF professional to improve students’ critical thinking skills through problem based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4), Article 042085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042085
  66. Setiyani, Waluya, S. B., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Cahyono, A. N. (2022). E-module design using Kvisoft flipbook application based on mathematics creative thinking ability for junior high schools. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(4), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i04.25329
  67. Shieh, C. J., & Nasongkhla, J. (2024). Effects of motivation to use social networking sites on students’ media literacy and critical thinking. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/14060
  68. Sitorus, D. S., Siswandari, & Kristiani. (2019). The effectiveness of accounting e-module integrated with character value to improve students’ learning outcomes and honesty. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.20878
  69. Song, H., & Cai, L. (2024). Interactive learning environment as a source of critical thinking skills for college students. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05247-y
  70. Song, X. (2016). ‘Critical thinking’ and pedagogical implications for higher education. East Asia, 33(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-015-9250-6
  71. Sujanem, R., & Putu Suwindra, I. N. (2023). Problem-based interactive physics e-module in physics learning through blended PBL to enhance students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39971
  72. Syahfitri, J., & Muntahanah, M. (2024). The effectiveness of local wisdom-based interactive digital module on students’ critical thinking disposition. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(4), 2170. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.28256
  73. Tangkish, N., Tumashbay, T., Shaldarbekova, A., Rakhimshikova, M., Aripzhan, G., & Yerbota, A. (2024). Digital mind and human consciousness: Integration of digital technology in shaping learning experiences. Perspectives of Science and Education, 69(3), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.3.4
  74. Xianxiao, Z. (2024). Simulation research on interactive entertainment e-learning based on visual saliency testing in music multimedia teaching system. Entertainment Computing, 50, Article 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100676
  75. Yafie, E., Samah, N. A., Mohamed, H., & Haqqi, Y. A. (2020). Collaborative mobile seamless learning (CMSL) based on android apps to improving critical thinking in higher education in the post-COVID-19 era. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(7 Special Issue), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12SP7/20202125
  76. Yandra, M., & Sari, N. M. (2020). Development of e-modules based on project based learning model for highway and bridge construction subject at vocational high schools. In Proceedings of the 1st Progress in Social Science, Humanities and Education Research Symposium (pp. 184–187). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200824.043
  77. Yi-Ming Kao, G., Yeh, H.-C., Su, S.-W., Chiang, X.-Z., & Sun, C.-T. (2025). Advancing a practical inquiry model with multi-perspective role-playing to foster critical thinking behavior in e-book reading. Computers & Education, 225, Article 105185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105185
  78. Zhang, K. E., & Jenkinson, J. (2024). The visual science communication toolkit: Responding to the need for visual science communication training in undergraduate life sciences education. Education Sciences, 14(3), Article 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030296