Research Article

Employing social media in building academic brands of the UAE’s universities: A comparative analysis

Shujun Jiang 1 * , Khalaf Tahat 1 2 , Ahmed El Gody 1 , Ahmed Al Mansoori 1
More Detail
1 Media and Creative Industries Dept., United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES2 Digital Journalism Dept., Yarmouk University, Irbid, JORDAN* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(1), January 2025, e202505, https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15872
Published: 25 January 2025
OPEN ACCESS   3289 Views   1220 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This paper studied the United Arab Emirates universities’ social media branding strategies based on an investigation of their performances on Twitter. Content analysis was conducted to examine universities’ tweet topics, image subjects, languages, and engagement features. The effectiveness of strategies is investigated by analyzing audience engagement metrics. We also compared social media strategies between private and public universities. Results indicated a discrepancy between universities’ branding efforts, audience preferences on social media, and different strategies between public and private universities. The study offered insights into how academic institutions can optimize the use of social media platforms in building their reputation amid intense competition locally and globally.
Keywords: university branding, strategies, social media, Twitter

CITATION (APA)

Jiang, S., Tahat, K., El Gody, A., & Al Mansoori, A. (2025). Employing social media in building academic brands of the UAE’s universities: A comparative analysis. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(1), e202505. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15872

REFERENCES

  1. Al Jenaibi, B. (2011). The changing representation of the Arab woman in Middle East advertising and media. Global Media Journal, 1(2), 67–88.
  2. Alim, S., & Abdulrahman, R. (2022). Content analysis of the main Twitter accounts of Saudi universities: A case for effective employers and community engagement. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD.297979
  3. Alqahtani, S. S., Abbasi, R., & Aljohani, N. (2020). A framework for analyzing public interaction of Saudi universities on Twitter. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3599776
  4. Alteneiji, E. 2023. Value changes in gender roles: Perspectives from three generations of Emirati women. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), Article 2184899. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2184899
  5. Alves, H., Fernandes, C., & Raposo, M. (2016). Social media marketing: A literature review and implications. Psychology & Marketing, 33(12), 1029–1038. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20936
  6. Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change: Key concepts, research traditions, open issues. In J. Androutsopoulos (Ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp. 3–48). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346831
  7. Belanger, C. H., Bali, S., & Longden, B. (2014). How Canadian universities use social media to brand themselves. Tertiary Education and Management, 20, 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2013.852237
  8. Belk, R., & Sobh, R. (2011). Gender and privacy in Arab Gulf states: Implications for consumption and marketing. InÖ. Sandıkcı, & G. Rice (Eds.), Handbook of Islamic marketing. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936028.00013
  9. Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353
  10. Beverly, J. A. (2013). Public relations models and dialogic communication in the Twitterverse: An analysis of how colleges and universities are engaging their publics through Twitter [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Southern Mississippi].
  11. Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Chinese and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748
  12. Brons, A. J., Pich, C., & de Leeuw, S. (2019). Managing higher education institutions in the age of social media: Network orchestration strategies for Twitter. Computers & Education, 141, Article 103616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103616
  13. Brunner, T. A., Kumar, A., & Swaminathan, V. (2017). A new look at social media’s role in developing brand attitudes. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(5), 502–514.
  14. Capriotti, P., & Zeler, I. (2023). Analysing effective social media communication in higher education institutions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 656. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02187-8
  15. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
  16. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). The science of Persuasion. Scientific American, 284(2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0201-76
  17. Commission of Academic Accreditation. (2023). Higher Education Institution. CAA. https://www.caa.ae/Pages/Institutes/All.aspx
  18. De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2011). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051255
  19. Emam, S. (2023). UAE social media statistics. Meltwater. https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/social-media-statistics-uae
  20. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  21. Ghalib, A. K., & Alhouti, S. (2020). The use of social media in student recruitment in higher education: The case of the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 30(1), 56–70.
  22. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  23. Han, G., & Peng, S. (2019). Analysis of tweet form’s effect on users’ engagement on Twitter. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), Article 1564168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1564168
  24. Hemsley-Brown, J., & Goonawardana, S. (2007). Brand harmonization in the international higher education market. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 942–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.019
  25. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
  26. Kelleher, T., & Sweetser, K. (2012). Social media adoption among university communicators. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2012.626130
  27. Kelly, K. J. (2013). The effectiveness of Twitter as a communication tool in college recruitment [Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University–Kingsville].
  28. Kemp, S. (2023). Digital 2023: Global digital overview. Meltwater. https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/changing-world-of-digital
  29. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
  30. McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438
  31. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
  32. Metcalfe, B. D. (2008). Women, management and globalization in the Middle East. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9654-3
  33. Reyes, I. (2004). Functions of code-switching in schoolchildren’s conversations. Bilingual Research Journal, 28(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2004.10162613
  34. Saxton, G. D., & Waters, R. D. (2014). What do stakeholders like on Facebook? Examining public reactions to nonprofit organizations’ informational, promotional, and community building messages. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.908721
  35. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
  36. Smiciklas M. (2012). The power of infographics: Using pictures to communicate and connect with your audiences. Pearson.
  37. Sörensen, I., Fürst, S., Vogler, D., & Schäfer, M. S. (2023). Higher education institutions on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter: Comparing Swiss universities’ social media communication. Media and Communication, 11(1), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6069
  38. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., & Chi, E. H. (2010). Want to be retweeted? large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Social Computing (pp. 177–184). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2010.33
  39. Sung, M., & Yang, S. (2008). Toward the model of university image: The influence of brand personality, external prestige, and reputation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20(4), pp. 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260802153207
  40. Tahat, K., Tahat, Z., Alhammad, K., & Qublan, B. (2020). The concept of professionalism in media from the journalists’ perspective in Jordan. Opcion, 36(27), 1212–1228.
  41. The UAE Ministry of Education. (2017). Higher education strategy 2030. The UAE Ministry of Education. https://www.moe.gov.ae/en/mediacenter/news/pages/h2030.aspx
  42. The UAE Ministry of Education. (2022). Open data. The UAE Ministry of Education https://www.moe.gov.ae/en/opendata/pages/home.aspx
  43. The United Arab Emirates’ Government Portal. (2023). The Principles of the 50. The UAE’s Government Portal. https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/uae-in-the-future/initiatives-of-the-next-50/the-principles-of-the-50
  44. Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2016). Scholars in an increasingly digital and open world: How do education professors and students use Twitter? The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.02.002
  45. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
  46. Waters, R. D., Canfield, R. R., Foster, J. M., & Hardy, E. E. (2011). Applying the dialogic theory to social networking sites. Journal of Social Marketing, 1, 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/20426761111170713
  47. Wilkins, S., Balakrishnan, M. S., & Huisman, J. (2012). Student choice in higher education: Motivations for choosing to study at an international branch campus. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(5), 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315311429002
  48. Zhan, M., Mei, F., & Li, L. (2018). Who creates trends in online social media: The crowd or opinion leaders? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12145