Research Article

Effects of message framing and video remix on health misinformation correction using short video applications

Rachel Hoi Yan Au 1 , Qiuyi Kong 2 3 , Yunya Song 4 , Ruqing Chen 1 , Kelly Yee Lai Ku 1 *
More Detail
1 Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, CHINA2 Bay Area School of Applied Psychological Sciences, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, Zhuhai, CHINA3 Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education (Beijing Normal University), Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, CHINA4 The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, CHINA* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 16(4), October 2026, e202648, https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/19269
Published: 17 September 2026
OPEN ACCESS   108 Views   40 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Short video applications (SVAs) have become prominent health information sources for adolescents, where they actively seek, share, and learn about health information. These platforms host diverse health information and provide an environment where misinformation is particularly “sticky,” especially around stigmatized issues such as eating disorders (ED), which are highly visible among adolescents. Misconceptions regarding ED, such as framing restrictive eating as lifestyle choices or failing to recognize ED in men, pose significant health risks for a vulnerable age group. Addressing health misinformation in these digital environments is critical, yet communication research has yet to establish effective correction strategies tailored to SVAs. This study examined the efficacy of remix videos that pair corrections with ED misinformation to counter related misconceptions on SVAs. Using a 2 × 2 + 1 experimental design, we tested 294 Chinese adolescents aged 15-17 who viewed either an ED misinformation-only video or remix correction videos that visually combined misinformation with rebuttals using platform remix tools. Remix corrections varied by message framing (fact-based vs. narrative-based) and remix format (sequential “stitch” vs. side-by-side “duet”). We measured cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. Videos featuring the lived experience of a male patient were particularly effective in improving attitudes and reducing stigma, especially in side-by-side duet formats, which produced downstream effects on adolescents’ willingness to support peers with ED. Results showed that videos as brief as one minute were sufficient to produce measurable correction outcomes, underscoring the potential of platform-specific remix techniques in combating health misinformation within adolescents’ native digital environments.
Keywords: health misinformation, misinformation correction, eating disorders, social media, short video applications, adolescents

CITATION (APA)

Au, R. H. Y., Kong, Q., Song, Y., Chen, R., & Ku, K. Y. L. (2026). Effects of message framing and video remix on health misinformation correction using short video applications. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 16(4), e202648. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/19269

REFERENCES

  1. Abidin, C. (2021). Mapping Internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science, 12(1), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Theories of Cognitive Self-Regulation, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. Allen, E., & Bird, M. (2019). The value of vulnerability in relationships. Family Perspectives, 1(1). https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/familyperspectives/vol1/iss1/7
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
  5. Aminpour, P., Helgeson, J. F., & Ferraro, P. J. (2022). The choice of message and messenger to drive behavior change that averts the health impacts of wildfires: An online randomized controlled experiment. BMC Public Health, 22(1), Article 2359. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14801-6
  6. Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018
  7. Appelman, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057
  8. Ariasi, N., & Mason, L. (2011). Uncovering the effect of text structure in learning from a science text: An eye-tracking study. Instructional Science, 39(5), 581-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9142-5
  9. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
  10. Au, E. S., & Cosh, S. M. (2022). Social media and eating disorder recovery: An exploration of Instagram recovery community users and their reasons for engagement. Eating Behaviors, 46, Article 101651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2022.101651
  11. Avella, H. (2024). “TikTok ≠ therapy”: Mediating mental health and algorithmic mood disorders. New Media & Society, 26(10), 6040-6058. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221147284
  12. Baghdadi, J. D., Coffey, K. C., Belcher, R., Frisbie, J., Hassan, N., Sim, D., & Malik, R. D. (2023). #Coronavirus on TikTok: User engagement with misinformation as a potential threat to public health behavior. JAMIA Open, 6(1), Article ooad013. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad013
  13. Baldor, T. (2022). Do I know you? Managing offline interaction in acquainted stranger relationships. Qualitative Sociology, 45(3), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-022-09515-5
  14. Barney, L. J., Griffiths, K. M., Christensen, H., & Jorm, A. F. (2010). The self-stigma of depression scale (SSDS): Development and psychometric evaluation of a new instrument. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 19(4), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.325
  15. Barta, K., & Andalibi, N. (2021). Constructing authenticity on TikTok: Social norms and social support on the “fun” platform. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5, Article 430. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479574
  16. Bhandari, A., & Bimo, S. (2022). Why’s everyone on TikTok now? The algorithmized self and the future of self-making on social media. Social Media + Society, 8(1), Article 20563051221086241. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086241
  17. Bhargava, P., MacDonald, K., Newton, C., Lin, H., & Pennycook, G. (2023). How effective are TikTok misinformation debunking videos? Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-114
  18. Bhattacharya, A. (2023). Parasocial interaction in social media influencer-based marketing: An SEM approach. Journal of Internet Commerce, 22(2), 272-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2022.2049112
  19. Blackburn, M. R., & Hogg, R. C. (2024). #ForYou? The impact of pro-ana TikTok content on body image dissatisfaction and internalisation of societal beauty standards. PLoS ONE, 19(8), Article e0307597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307597
  20. Bonnamy, J., Calvert, S., Bennett, C., Dart, J., Molloy, R., & Brand, G. (2025). Students’ perspectives from co-designed, lived experience eating disorders education: A qualitative inquiry. Nurse Education Today, 144, Article 106412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106412
  21. Bulik, C. M. (2016). Towards a science of eating disorders: Replacing myths with realities: The fourth Birgit Olsson lecture. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 70(3), 224-230. https://doi.org/10.3109/08039488.2015.1074284
  22. Chao, M., Lei, J., He, R., Jiang, Y., & Yang, H. (2023). TikTok use and psychosocial factors among adolescents: Comparisons of non-users, moderate users, and addictive users. Psychiatry Research, 325, Article 115247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115247
  23. Chesney, E., Goodwin, G. M., & Fazel, S. (2014). Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: A meta-review. World Psychiatry, 13(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20128
  24. Clarke, M. (2012). The digital revolution. In R. Campbell, E. Pentz, & I. Bortwick (Eds.), Academic and professional publishing (pp. 79-98). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-669-2.50004-4
  25. Corrigan, P. W., & Rao, D. (2012). On the self-stigma of mental illness: Stages, disclosure, and strategies for change. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 57(8), 464-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371205700804
  26. Crisafulli, M. A., Thompson-Brenner, H., Franko, D. L., Eddy, K. T., & Herzog, D. B. (2010). Stigmatization of anorexia nervosa: Characteristics and response to intervention. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(7), 756-770. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.7.756
  27. Dan, V., & Coleman, R. (2025). “I’ll change my beliefs when I see it”: Video fact checks outperform text fact checks in correcting misperceptions among those holding false or uncertain pre-existing beliefs. Communication Research, 52(6), 778-802. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241287870
  28. Das, S., Karmakar, S., & Das, T. (2026). The future of digital learning in the era of misinformation. In Effects of education communication in digital learning environments (pp. 385-408). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9067-2.ch012
  29. de Vos, J. A., LaMarre, A., Radstaak, M., Bijkerk, C. A., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Westerhof, G. J. (2017). Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: A systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-017-0164-0
  30. Demuyakor, J., Nyatuame, I. N., & Obiri, S. (2021). Unmasking COVID-19 vaccine “infodemic” in the social media. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 11(4), Article e202119. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/11200
  31. Denniss, E., & Lindberg, R. (2025). Social media and the spread of misinformation: Infectious and a threat to public health. Health Promotion International, 40(2), Article daaf023. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf023
  32. Doley, J. R., Hart, L. M., Stukas, A. A., Petrovic, K., Bouguettaya, A., & Paxton, S. J. (2017). Interventions to reduce the stigma of eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50(3), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22691
  33. Doyle, B. (2024). TikTok statistics—Everything you need to know [May 2024 update]. Wallaroo Media. https://wallaroomedia.com/blog/tiktok-statistics/
  34. Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
  35. Ecker, U. K. H., O’Reilly, Z., Reid, J. S., & Chang, E. P. (2020). The effectiveness of short-format refutational fact-checks. British Journal of Psychology, 111(1), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12383
  36. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  37. Faverio, M., & Sidoti, O. (2025). Teens, social media and AI chatbots 2025. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/12/09/teens-social-media-and-ai-chatbots-2025/
  38. Feldhege, J. M., Gulec, H., Moessner, M., Stieler, C., van Stipelen, J., & Bauer, S. (2022). Stigmatization and attitudes toward eating disorders: A comparison between native German adolescents, Turkish immigrant adolescents in Germany, and native Turkish adolescents. Journal of Mental Health, 31(1), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.1979484
  39. Georgiou, N., Pellizzer, M. L., Balzan, R. P., & Wade, T. D. (2026). “You say cognitive, I say cognitive”: Can misinformation-informed interventions help reduce risk for disordered eating in youth? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 59(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24552
  40. Georgiou, N., Thompson, M., Bridgland, V., Wade, T., & Balzan, R. (2025). People at-risk of an eating disorder are more likely to endorse dietary misinformation claims and hold rigid beliefs. Journal of Health Psychology, 30(13), 3786-3802. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251324695
  41. Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279-305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
  42. Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 511-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.001
  43. Gorrell, S., & Murray, S. B. (2019). Eating disorders in males. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 28(4), 641-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2019.05.012
  44. Green, M. C. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), S163-S183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00288.x
  45. Greenberg, S. T., & Schoen, E. G. (2008). Males and eating disorders: Gender-based therapy for eating disorder recovery. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(4), 464-471. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.39.4.464
  46. Griffiths, S. K. (2021). Investigating the impact of shame and stigma on social support seeking during eating disorder recovery [PhD thesis, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/623208cc45bff9910aa56d9b6655e686/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  47. Griffiths, S., Harris, E. A., Whitehead, G., Angelopoulos, F., Stone, B., Grey, W., & Dennis, S. (2024). Does TikTok contribute to eating disorders? A comparison of the TikTok algorithms belonging to individuals with eating disorders versus healthy controls. Body Image, 51, Article 101807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101807
  48. Guy, J., Bould, H., Lewis, G., & Solmi, F. (2022). Stigmatising views towards individuals with eating disorders: Trends and associations from 1998 to 2008 using a repeated cross-sectional design. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 220(5), 272-278. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.175
  49. Hamilton, A., Mitchison, D., Basten, C., Byrne, S., Goldstein, M., Hay, P., Heruc, G., Thornton, C., & Touyz, S. (2022). Understanding treatment delay: Perceived barriers preventing treatment-seeking for eating disorders. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 56(3), 248-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674211020102
  50. Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1104-1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x
  51. Hayes, C., Stott, K., Lamb, K. J., & Hurst, G. A. (2020). “Making every second count”: Utilizing TikTok and systems thinking to facilitate scientific public engagement and contextualization of chemistry at home. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3858-3866. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00511
  52. Heath, P. J., Brenner, R. E., Lannin, D. G., & Vogel, D. L. (2018). Self-compassion moderates the relationship of perceived public and anticipated self-stigma of seeking help. Stigma and Health, 3(1), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000072
  53. Hu, S., Gan, J., Shi, V., & Krug, I. (2023). Chinese TikTok (Douyin) challenges and body image concerns: A pilot study. Journal of Eating Disorders, 11(1), Article 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00829-5
  54. İlhan, S., & Evran, T. (2025). The quality and reliability of YouTube and TikTok videos on epidural blood patch: A cross-sectional analysis. Medicine, 104(31), Article e43628. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000043628
  55. Iodice, R., & Papapicco, C. (2021). To be a TikToker in COVID-19 era: An experience of social influence. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 11(1), Article e202103. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/9615
  56. Kaňková, J., Binder, A., & Matthes, J. (2024). Helpful or harmful? Navigating the impact of social media influencers’ health advice: Insights from health expert content creators. BMC Public Health, 24(1), Article 3511. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-21095-3
  57. Kaye, D. B. V. (2022). Please duet this: Collaborative music making in lockdown on TikTok. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 15(1). https://ojs.meccsa.org.uk/index.php/netknow/article/view/654
  58. Keer, M., van den Putte, B., & Neijens, P. (2010). The role of affect and cognition in health decision making. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(1), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X425337
  59. Keith, L., Gillanders, D., & Simpson, S. (2009). An exploration of the main sources of shame in an eating-disordered population. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 16(4), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.629
  60. Kelty, C., & Erickson, S. (2018). Two modes of participation: A conceptual analysis of 102 cases of Internet and social media participation from 2005-2015. The Information Society, 34(2), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1414092
  61. Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). The knowledge revision components (KReC) framework: Processes and mechanisms. In D. N. Rapp, & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 353-377). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9737.003.0022
  62. Kirkpatrick, C. E., & Lawrie, L. L. (2024). TikTok as a source of health information and misinformation for young women in the United States: Survey study. JMIR Infodemiology, 4(1), Article e54663. https://doi.org/10.2196/54663
  63. Klug, D., Evans, M., & Kaufman, G. (2022). How TikTok served as a platform for young people to share and cope with lived COVID-19 experiences. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 38(73), 152-170. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v38i73.128463
  64. Klump, K. L., Bulik, C. M., Kaye, W. H., Treasure, J., & Tyson, E. (2009). Academy for eating disorders position paper: Eating disorders are serious mental illnesses. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42(2), 97-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20589
  65. Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D., Clark, E. M., O’Keefe, D. J., Erwin, D. O., Holmes, K., Hinyard, L. J., Houston, T., & Woolley, S. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879904
  66. Ku, K. Y. L., Li, J., Luo, Y., & Song, Y. (2025). Correction approaches and hashtag framing in addressing Mpox misinformation on Instagram. Health Education Research, 40(2), Article cyaf009. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyaf009
  67. Lannin, D. G., Vogel, D. L., Brenner, R. E., & Tucker, J. R. (2015). Predicting self-esteem and intentions to seek counseling: The internalized stigma model Ψ. The Counseling Psychologist, 43(1), 64-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000014541550
  68. Lau, N., Srinakarin, K., Aalfs, H., Zhao, X., & Palermo, T. M. (2025). TikTok and teen mental health: An analysis of user-generated content and engagement. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 50(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae039
  69. Lee, C. S., & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002
  70. Li, G., Li, M., & Yang, S. (2025). The “whole-of-society” approach for misinformation correction: How expert didactic TikTok videos motivate citizen fact-checking and vaccine promotion. Journal of Health Communication, 30(10-12), 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2025.2503179
  71. Linville, D., Brown, T., Sturm, K., & McDougal, T. (2012). Eating disorders and social support: Perspectives of recovered individuals. Eating Disorders, 20(3), 216-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2012.668480
  72. Lookingbill, V., Mohammadi, E., & Cai, Y. (2023). Assessment of accuracy, user engagement, and themes of eating disorder content in social media short videos. JAMA Network Open, 6(4), Article e238897. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8897
  73. Lu, L., Liu, M., Ge, B., Bai, Z., & Liu, Z. (2022). Adolescent addiction to short video applications in the mobile Internet era. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893599
  74. Lu, X., & Jin, Y. (2024). Optimizing organizational corrective communication: The effects of correction placement timing, refutation detail level, and corrective narrative type on combating crisis misinformation narratives. Public Relations Review, 50(5), 102514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102514
  75. Ma, I., Sultan, M., Kozyreva, A., & van den Bos, W. (2025). Understanding the impact of misinformation on adolescents. Nature Human Behaviour, 10, 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02338-8
  76. Mair, P., & Wilcox, R. (2020). Robust statistical methods in R using the WRS2 package. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 464-488. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01246-w
  77. Maulidiyah, C. F. M., Zainuddin, Z., & Hamdani, B. (2025). Students’ views on utilizing TikTok daily vlogs to enhance speaking skills in English learning. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 8(1), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v8i1.1458
  78. Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
  79. McMullan, J. (2020). A new understanding of ‘new media’: Online platforms as digital mediums. Convergence, 26(2), 287-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517738159
  80. Mento, C., Silvestri, M. C., Muscatello, M. R. A., Rizzo, A., Celebre, L., Praticò, M., Zoccali, R. A., & Bruno, A. (2021). Psychological impact of pro-anorexia and pro-eating disorder websites on adolescent females: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), Article 2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042186
  81. Mills, R., Hyam, L., & Schmidt, U. (2023). A narrative review of early intervention for eating disorders: Barriers and facilitators. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 14, 217-235. https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S415698
  82. Mond, J. M., Robertson-Smith, G., & Vetere, A. (2006). Stigma and eating disorders: Is there evidence of negative attitudes towards anorexia nervosa among women in the community? Journal of Mental Health, 15(5), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230600902559
  83. Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
  84. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2004). Persuasion as a dynamic, multidimensional process: An investigation of individual and intraindividual differences. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 337-363. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002337
  85. Murphy, P. K., & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and beliefs. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 305-324). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  86. Musić, S., Elwyn, R., Fountas, G., Gnatt, I., Jenkins, Z. M., Malcolm, A., Miles, S., Neill, E., Simpson, T., Yolland, C. O., & Phillipou, A. (2022). Valuing the voice of lived experience of eating disorders in the research process: Benefits and considerations. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 56(3), 216-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867421998794
  87. Nguyen, H., & Diederich, M. (2023). Facilitating knowledge construction in informal learning: A study of TikTok scientific, educational videos. Computers & Education, 205, Article 104896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104896
  88. NHS England. (2021). Overview – Eating disorders. NHS.UK. https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/feelings-symptoms-behaviours/behaviours/eating-disorders/overview/
  89. Nyhan, B., Porter, E., Reifler, J., & Wood, T. J. (2020). Taking fact-checks literally but not seriously? The effects of journalistic fact-checking on factual beliefs and candidate favorability. Political Behavior, 42(3), 939-960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x
  90. O’Connor, C., McNamara, N., O’Hara, L., McNicholas, M., & McNicholas, F. (2021). How do people with eating disorders experience the stigma associated with their condition? A mixed-methods systematic review. Journal of Mental Health, 30(4), 454-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2019.1685081
  91. O’Toole, K. (2023). Collaborative creativity in TikTok music duets. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581380
  92. Orben, A. C., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2017). Social media and relationship development: The effect of valence and intimacy of posts. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.006
  93. Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1
  94. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
  95. Palminteri, S., Lefebvre, G., Kilford, E. J., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2017). Confirmation bias in human reinforcement learning: Evidence from counterfactual feedback processing. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(8), Article e1005684. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005684
  96. Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609-647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.609
  97. Quick, M., & Maddox, J. (2024). Us, them, right, wrong: How TikTok’s green screen, duet, and stitch help shape political discourse. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i3.13360
  98. Radovanović, B. S. (2022). TikTok and sound: Changing the ways of creating, promoting, distributing and listening to music. INSAM Journal of Contemporary Music, Art and Technology, (9), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.51191/issn.2637-1898.2022.5.9.51
  99. Rifkin, J. R., Chan, C., & Kahn, B. E. (2025). Anxiety about the social consequences of missed group experiences intensifies fear of missing out (FOMO). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 128(2), 300-313. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000418
  100. Rohde, P., Stice, E., & Marti, C. N. (2015). Development and predictive effects of eating disorder risk factors during adolescence: Implications for prevention efforts. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22270
  101. Rosenberg, H., Syed, S., & Rezaie, S. (2020). The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 22(4), 418-421. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2020.361
  102. Ruiz-Centeno, C., Cueto-Galán, R., Pena-Andreu, J. M., & Fontalba-Navas, A. (2025). Problematic internet use and its relationship with eating disorders. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1464172
  103. Sangalang, A., Ophir, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2019). The potential for narrative correctives to combat misinformation. Journal of Communication, 69(3), 298-319. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz014
  104. Schmid, P., & Betsch, C. (2019). Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(9), 931-939. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0632-4
  105. Schroeder, N. L., & Cenkci, A. T. (2018). Spatial contiguity and spatial split-attention effects in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 679-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9435-9
  106. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
  107. Sharevski, F., Vander Loop, J., Jachim, P., Devine, A., & Das, S. (2025). “Debunk-it-yourself”: Health professionals strategies for responding to misinformation on TikTok. In Proceedings of the New Security Paradigms Workshop (pp. 35-55). https://doi.org/10.1145/3703465.3703469
  108. Song, Y., Lu, Y., Tsang, S. J., Zhang, J., & Ku, K. Y. L. (2025). When corrections fail: Effects of misinformation targets, repeated exposure, and partisanship on misinformation beliefs. International Journal of Communication, 19, 392-416. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/23090
  109. Sonneville, K. R., & Lipson, S. K. (2018). Disparities in eating disorder diagnosis and treatment according to weight status, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic background, and sex among college students. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 51(6), 518-526. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22846
  110. Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Pelikan, J. M., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Slonska, Z., Kondilis, B., Stoffels, V., Osborne, R. H., & Brand, H. (2013). Measuring health literacy in populations: Illuminating the design and development process of the European health literacy survey questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q). BMC Public Health, 13(1), Article 948. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-948
  111. Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative. https://betterlegalinfo.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Sundar-paper.pdf
  112. Sundar, S. S., Molina, M. D., & Cho, E. (2021). Seeing is believing: Is video modality more powerful in spreading fake news via online messaging apps? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(6), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab010
  113. Swan, S., & Andrews, B. (2003). The relationship between shame, eating disorders and disclosure in treatment. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42(4), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466503322528919
  114. Swire-Thompson, B., Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Berinsky, A. J. (2020). They might be a liar but they’re my liar: Source evaluation and the prevalence of misinformation. Political Psychology, 41(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12586
  115. Taba, M., Ayre, J., Freeman, B., McCaffery, K., & Bonner, C. (2023). COVID-19 messages targeting young people on social media: Content analysis of Australian health authority posts. Health Promotion International, 38(2), Article daad034. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daad034
  116. Thörel, N., & Thörel, E. (2024). Combating the volitional stigma of eating disorders: Can empathy reduce the perception that individuals with eating disorders are to blame for their conditions? Stigma and Health, 9(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000355
  117. Thornicroft, G., Mehta, N., Clement, S., Evans-Lacko, S., Doherty, M., Rose, D., Koschorke, M., Shidhaye, R., O’Reilly, C., & Henderson, C. (2016). Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination. The Lancet, 387(10023), 1123-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00298-6
  118. Tolorunleke, C. A., Adalikwu, T. M.-E., & Tolorunleke, C. A. (2025). The impact of Tiktok’s fast-paced content on attention span of students (no. 2025010269). Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202501.0269.v1
  119. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Ayres, P. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504793
  120. Vandereycken, W., & Van Humbeeck, I. (2008). Denial and concealment of eating disorders: A retrospective survey. European Eating Disorders Review: The Journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 16(2), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.857
  121. Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., & Abidin, C. (2023). TeachTok: Teachers of TikTok, micro-celebrification, and fun learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 123, Article 103978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103978
  122. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
  123. Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2018). I do not believe you: How providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1337-1353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313883
  124. Walter, N., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation. Communication Monographs, 85(3), 423-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564
  125. Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020). A meta-analytic examination of the continued influence of misinformation in the face of correction: How powerful is it, why does it happen, and how to stop it? Communication Research, 47(2), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219854600
  126. Wang, M. L., & Togher, K. (2024). Health misinformation on social media and adolescent health. JAMA Pediatrics, 178(2), 109-110. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.5282
  127. Wirz, D. S., & Zai, F. (2025). Infotainment on social media: How news companies combine information and entertainment in news stories on Instagram and TikTok. Digital Journalism, 13(7), 1249-1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2025.2464062
  128. Xu, Z., Gao, X., Wei, J., Liu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Adolescent user behaviors on short video application, cognitive functioning and academic performance. Computers & Education, 203, Article 104865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104865
  129. Yang, S., Zhao, Y., & Ma, Y. (2019). Analysis of the reasons and development of short video application—taking tik tok as an example. In Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Conference on Information and Social Science (pp. 12-14). https://webofproceedings.org/proceedings_series/article/artId/10287.html
  130. Yuen, K. K. (1974). The two-sample trimmed t for unequal population variances. Biometrika, 61(1), 165-170. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.165
  131. Yuksel, M., & Labrecque, L. I. (2016). “Digital buddies”: Parasocial interactions in social media. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(4), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-03-2016-0023
  132. Zebregs, S., van den Putte, B., Neijens, P., & de Graaf, A. (2015). The differential impact of statistical and narrative evidence on beliefs, attitude, and intention: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 30(3), 282-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.842528
  133. Zhu, C., Xu, X., Zhang, W., Chen, J., & Evans, R. (2020). How health communication via TikTok makes a difference: A content analysis of TikTok accounts run by Chinese provincial health committees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010192
  134. Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872-1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603