Review Article

Cyberbullying and bystanders: A bibliometric analysis

Hailan Chen 1 2 , Izzal Asnira Zolkepli 1 *
More Detail
1 School of Communication, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, MALAYSIA2 School of Theater, Film and Television, Sichuan University of Culture and Arts, Mianyang, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(1), January 2025, e202510, https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15951
Published: 13 February 2025
OPEN ACCESS   3594 Views   1225 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The negative effects of cyberbullying are broad and have become a global problem, affecting people of multiple age groups and identities. Despite the growing body of research on cyberbullying, especially on bystanders and interventions, instances of ignored cyberbullying victimization still persist. This phenomenon suggests greater examination of current bystander research, and this literature therefore maps and analyses the research contributions in this field and identifies future lines of research. The research findings are based on an examination of academic publications listed in Web of Science in the period 2007–2024 which were mapped using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses technique and bibliometric software (VOSviewer and the R software package Biblioshiny). (1) Analysis of the data reveals the current distribution of published research findings in the field, identifying the most impactful journal as Computers in Human Behavior, the core author as Vandebosch, the most prolific affiliation as University of Antwerp, and the most prolific country as the USA. (2) Analysis of the data reveals collaboration patterns between authors and countries, showing same affiliation co-authors to predominate and a lack of collaboration between countries. (3) Analysis of the data parses research trends in bystander intervention behavior research and proposes the directions of future research should focus on examining multiple social media platforms and school-based coping strategies in cyberbullying. The content analysis of relevant articles conducted by this study should provide valuable clues for those researching or intending to enter this field of study, as well as help to raise the emphasis on such research in academia.
Keywords: bibliometric analysis, cyberbullying, bystander, VOSviewer, Biblioshiny

CITATION (APA)

Chen, H., & Zolkepli, I. A. (2025). Cyberbullying and bystanders: A bibliometric analysis. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(1), e202510. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15951

REFERENCES

  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Viel, F. (2011). The field-standardized average impact of national research systems compared to world average: The case of Italy. Scientometrics, 88(2), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0406-x
  2. Achuthan, K., Nair, V. K., Kowalski, R., Ramanathan, S., & Raman, R. (2023). Cyberbullying research — Alignment to sustainable development and impact of COVID-19: Bibliometrics and science mapping analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, Article 107566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107566
  3. Agatston, P. W., Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2007). Students’ perspectives on cyber bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S59–S60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.003
  4. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  5. Bansal, S., Garg, N., & Singh, J. (2023). Perpetrators’ perspective on cyberbullying: A qualitative systematic review with bibliometric analysis. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-06-2023-0265
  6. Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioral intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.036
  7. Büyükkidik, S. (2022). A bibliometric analysis: A tutorial for the bibliometrix package in R using IRT literature. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 13(3), 164–193. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1069307
  8. Chen, Q., Xiao, Q., Liu, B., & Lu, Z. (2023). Bystander reaction differences between cyberbullying victims and non-victims among Chinese adolescents: The roles of online and offline social capitals. Child & Family Social Work, 29(2), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13088
  9. Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
  10. Cohen-­Almagor, R. (2020). Cyberbullying, moral responsibility, and social networking. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 16(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.16.1.4
  11. Coyne, I., Gopaul, A., Campbell, M., Pankász, A., Garland, R., & Cousans, F. (2019). Bystander responses to bullying at work: The role of mode, type and relationship to target. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2
  12. Cretu, D. M., & Morandau, F. (2022). Bullying and cyberbullying: A bibliometric analysis of three decades of research in education. Educational Review, 76(2), 371–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2034749
  13. DeSmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., Cardon, G., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2016). Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.051
  14. Desmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2012). Mobilizing bystanders of cyberbullying: An exploratory study into behavioral determinants of defending the victim. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 181, 58–63. http://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-121-2-58
  15. Ding, X., & Yang, Z. (2020). Knowledge mapping of platform research: A visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Electronic Commerce Research, 22(3), 787–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7
  16. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  17. Englander, E. (2021). Bullying, cyberbullying, anxiety, and depression in a sample of youth during the coronavirus pandemic. Pediatric Reports, 13(3), 546–551. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric13030064
  18. Ghorbani, B. D. (2024). Bibliometrix: Science mapping analysis with R Biblioshiny based on Web of Science in applied linguistics. In H. Meihami, & R. Esfandiari (Eds.), A scientometrics research perspective in applied linguistics (pp. 197–234). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51726-6_8
  19. Guleria, D., & Kaur, G. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of ecopreneurship using VOSviewer and RStudio Bibliometrix, 1989-2019. Library Hi Tech, 39(4), 1001–1024. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-09-2020-0218
  20. Hendry, B. P., Hellsten, L. A. M., McIntyre, L. J., & Smith, B. R. (2023). Recommendations for cyberbullying prevention and intervention: A Western Canadian perspective from key stakeholders. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1067484
  21. Herrerías, A. I. F., Torres, M. G. J., Terrón, P. D., & Guerrero, A. J. M. (2024). Cyberaggression and cybervictimisation in adolescents: Bibliometric analysis in web of science. Heliyon, 10(1), Article e23329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23329
  22. Herry, E., Gönültaş, S., & Mulvey, K. L. (2021). Digital era bullying: An examination of adolescent judgments about bystander intervention online. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 76, Article 101322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101322
  23. Hu, Y., Fiedler, S., & Weber, B. (2019). What drives the (un)empathic bystander to intervene? Insights from eye tracking. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12354
  24. Kim, Y. J., Qian, L., & Aslam, M. S. (2021). Bibliometric analysis on workplace cyberbullying: Study protocol. F1000Research, 10, Article 225. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51495.1
  25. Li, J., Wu, Y., & Hesketh, T. (2023). Internet use and cyberbullying: Impacts on psychosocial and psychosomatic wellbeing among Chinese adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, Article 107461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107461
  26. Liu, C., Yin, X., & Huang, P. (2021). Cyberbullying: Effect of emergency perception on the helping tendencies of bystanders. Telematics and Informatics, 62, Article 101627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101627
  27. Ma, F. A. M. X., & Xi, M. (1992). Status and trends of bibliometric. Journal of Information Science, 13(5), 7–17.
  28. Machackova, H. (2020). Bystander reactions to cyberbullying and cyberaggression: Individual, contextual, and social factors. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.003
  29. Macháčková, H., Dedkova, L., Sevcikova, A., & Cerna, A. (2013). Bystanders’ support of cyberbullied schoolmates. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2135
  30. Maurya, C., Muhammad, T., Dhillon, P., & Maurya, P. (2022). The effects of cyberbullying victimization on depression and suicidal ideation among adolescents and young adults: A three year cohort study from India. BMC Psychiatry, 22, Article 599. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04238-x
  31. Mayr, P., & Scharnhorst, A. (2014). Scientometrics and information retrieval: Weak-links revitalized. Scientometrics, 102(3), 2193–2199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1484-3
  32. Meinarni, N. P. S., Pande, N. K. N. N., Willdahlia, A. G., & Winatha, K. R. (2020). Legal knowledge development plan in responding student’s understanding on IT law: “Pawongan” approach. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.152
  33. Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. El Profesional de la Informacion, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
  34. Nagar, P. M., Leduc, K., Khalili, N., & Talwar, V. (2022). Cyber-bystander behavior among Canadian and Iranian youth: The influence of bystander type and relationship to the perpetrator on moral responsibility. Frontiers in Communication, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.796146
  35. Nobanee, H., Hamadi, F. Y. A., Abdulaziz, F. A., Abukarsh, L. S., Alqahtani, A. F., AlSubaey, S. K., Alqahtani, S. M., & Almansoori, H. A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of sustainability and risk management. Sustainability, 13(6), Article 3277. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063277
  36. Obermaier, M., Fawzi, N., & Koch, T. (2016). Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1491–1507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814563519
  37. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . ., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  38. Paula, D. C. F., Simão, A. M. V., Pereira, N. S., Paulino, P., & Oliveira, S. (2020). Online verbal aggression, social relationships, and self-efficacy beliefs. New Media & Society, 23(5), 960–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820905531
  39. Peprah, P., Oduro, M. S., Okwei, R., Adu, C., Asiamah-Asare, B. Y., & Agyemang-Duah, W. (2023). Cyberbullying victimization and suicidal ideation among in-school adolescents in three countries: Implications for prevention and intervention. BMC Psychiatry, 23, Article 944. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05268-9
  40. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, Article 348.
  41. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  42. Sónia, Da Costa Ferreira, P., Pereira, N., & Simão, A. M. V. (2024). A comparative analysis of adolescents’ emotions and emotion regulation strategies when witnessing different cyberbullying scenarios. Heliyon, 10(9), Article e29705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29705
  43. UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/TRVR4270
  44. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. UN. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
  45. Valkenburg, P. M., Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., Van Driel, I. I., & Keijsers, L. (2021). Social media browsing and adolescent well-being: Challenging the “passive social media use hypothesis.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(1), Article zmab015. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab015
  46. Van Cleemput, K., Vandebosch, H., & Pabian, S. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping,” “joining in,” and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40(5), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21534
  47. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  48. Vaterlaus, J. M., & Winter, M. (2021). TikTok: An exploratory study of young adults’ uses and gratifications. The Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1969882
  49. Wright, M. F. (2024). The associations among cyberbullying victimization and Chinese and American adolescents’ mental health issues: The protective role of perceived parental and friend support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(8), Article 1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21081069
  50. Zhang, X., Estoque, R. C., Xie, H., Murayama, Y., & Ranagalage, M. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles on ecosystem services. PLoS ONE, 14(2), Article e0210707. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210707
  51. Zhu, C., Huang, S., Evans, R., & Zhang, W. (2021). Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: A comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and preventive measures. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.634909