Research Article

Conceptualizing Interactivity on Social Media and Exploring the Effects of Interactivity on Consumers’ Engagement with Online Social-Interactions

Fei Qiao 1 *
More Detail
1 School of Journalism and Communication, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, CHINA* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 9(3), July 2019, e201913, https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/5781
OPEN ACCESS   4749 Views   5509 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

With the rapid acceptance of using social media to achieve interactive engagement come varied opportunities for businesses to communicate with their customers and clients. Through an analysis of McDonald’s “Our Food, Your Questions” campaign on social media platforms, our aim for the present study is two-fold. First, we conceptualize interactivity on the content-community level of social media on a continuum from low- to middle- to high-order, and we distinguish between medium-based interactivity, conversation-based interactivity, and process-based interactivity. Second, we examine the effects of these interactive strategies on users. The results show that conversation-based interactivity generates greater participation as well as emotional and social-engagement than does medium-based interactivity. Additionally, process-based interactivity produces more positive, emotional-social engagement than do either conversation-based interactivity or medium-based interactivity. We conclude by discussing the theoretical and practical implications for advancing our knowledge of interactivity on social media and marketing practices.
Keywords: interactivity conceptualization, medium-based interactivity, process-based interactivity, conservation-based interactivity, social-interactivity, content-community level of social media

CITATION (APA)

Qiao, F. (2019). Conceptualizing Interactivity on Social Media and Exploring the Effects of Interactivity on Consumers’ Engagement with Online Social-Interactions. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 9(3), e201913. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/5781

REFERENCES

  1. Aguilhar, L. (2018). 15 social media statistics you need to know. Strike Social. Retrieved from https://strikesocial.com/blog/15-social-media-marketing-statistics-you-need-to-know/
  2. Aikat, D. (2000). A new medium for organizational communication: Analyzing web content characteristics of Fortune 500 companies. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10(1), 2.
  3. Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical analyses for language assessment. Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667350
  4. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  5. Facebook. (2017). What does it mean to “like” something? Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/help/110920455663362
  6. Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New media & society, 15(8), 1348-1365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472322
  7. Hainla, L. (2018). 21 Social media marketing statistics you need to know in 2018. Dream Grow. Retrieved from https://www.dreamgrow.com/21-social-media-marketing-statistics/
  8. Hasson, U., Chen, J., & Honey, C. J. (2015). Hierarchical process memory: Memory as an integral component of information processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.006
  9. Kang, J., Tang, L., & Fiore, A. M. (2014). Enhancing consumer–brand relationships on restaurant Facebook fan pages: Maximizing consumer benefits and increasing active participation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.08.015
  10. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.08.015
  11. Kelleher, T. (2009). Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01410.x
  12. Ksiazek, T. B., Peer, L., & Lessard, K. (2016). User engagement with online news: Conceptualizing interactivity and exploring the relationship between online news videos and user comments. New Media & Society, 18(3), 502-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814545073
  13. Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685
  14. McMillan, S.J. (2002) ‘Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple ResearchTraditions: Users, Documents, and Systems’, in L. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds). The Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs, pp. 163–82. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446206904.n13
  15. Mersey, R. D., Malthouse, E. C., & Calder, B. J. (2010). Engagement with online media. Journal of Media Business Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2010.11073506
  16. Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997) Networked Interactivity, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x
  17. Salomon, G. (1997) Of mind and media, Phi Delta Kappa, 78(5), 375–81.
  18. Schultz, F., Utz, S., & Göritz, A. (2011). Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001
  19. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London; New York: Wiley.
  20. Starkman, N. (2014). What McDonald’s new “transparency”campaign is hiding. Retrieved from http://time.com/3501921/mcdonalds-transparency-campaign/
  21. Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. (2003). Explicating web site interactivity impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research, 30(1), 30-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202239025
  22. Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 384-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106
  23. TechTerms.com. (2014). Hyperlinks. Retrieved from http://techterms.com/definition/hyperlink
  24. Tremayne, M. (2008). Manipulating interactivity with thematically hyperlinked news texts: Amedia learning experiment. New Media & Society, 10(5), 703-727. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808094353
  25. Walther, J. B. (1994) Anticipated Ongoing Interaction versus Channel Effects on Relational Communication in Computer – Mediated Interaction, Human Communication Research 20,473–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00332.x
  26. Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2004). Towards understanding members’ general participation in and active contribution to an online travel community. Tourism Management, 25(6), 709-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2003.09.011
  27. Wang, Y., Qiao, F., & Peng, W. (2015). Is the size or the valence of proactive engagement associated with purchase intention? A case study of branded blogs of Starbucks. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(3), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2014.924125