Review Article

Bibliometric insights into artificial intelligence’s ethical and social dynamics

Oksana K. Korobkova 1 , Alfiya R. Masalimova 2 * , Alexey A. Chistyakov 3 , Alexey D. Chudnovskiy 4 , Marina A. Zhukova 4 , Vadim A. Zhukov 4 , Alisher I. Irismetov 5
More Detail
1 Pacific National University, Khabarovsk, RUSSIA2 The Institute of Psychology and Education, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA3 Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, RUSSIA4 The State University of Management, Moscow, RUSSIA5 Kazan National Research Technological University, Kazan, RUSSIA* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(4), October 2025, e202539, https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/17543
Published: 15 December 2025
OPEN ACCESS   48 Views   14 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This present bibliometric study aims to evaluate the extent of knowledge on the ethical and social aspects of artificial intelligence (AI) based on publications to be published within 2014-2024. Therefore, the present paper identifies some of the largest and most pressing trends and problems in the field of AI ethics and its social impact based on the analysis of 234 publications retrieved from the Scopus database. After analyzing the result of the literature review of the hereby presented publications, it is possible to state that the number of publications has been gradually increasing in the recent years and it can be linked to the interest and research activities. They focus on the beautiful things and the main tasks of a researcher within the given topic of interest. A similar observation made during the authorship analysis had to do with the fact that scholars and research groups have been the ones proactively building the AI ethics. From a geographical perspective, it expounds on the nations that are participating and have crucial engagement in the study area within this domain. This study also considers several aspects like is it more about the relative frequency in the cited journals to AI ethics and universities that are more organizationally involved. Consequently, this bibliometric analysis aims at offering an overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the ethical and social implications of AI. Therefore, the present work contributes to the. As has been seen, results from qualitative studies enrich the body of literature extending the current quantitative analysis in the related field.

CITATION (APA)

Korobkova, O. K., Masalimova, A. R., Chistyakov, A. A., Chudnovskiy, A. D., Zhukova, M. A., Zhukov, V., & Irismetov, A. I. (2025). Bibliometric insights into artificial intelligence’s ethical and social dynamics. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(4), e202539. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/17543

REFERENCES

  1. Alaeddini, M., Hajizadeh, M., & Reaidy, P. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of research on the convergence of artificial intelligence and blockchain in smart cities. Smart Cities, 6(2), 764-795. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020037
  2. Alam, N. (2024). Improving IT control compliance using artificial intelligence. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 13(5), 43-46. https://doi.org/10.47760/ijcsmc.2024.v13i05.003
  3. Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Rahwan, I. (2020). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6
  4. Ayub, Z., & Banday, M. T. (2023). Ethics in artificial intelligence: An analysis of ethical issues and possible solutions. In Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Technologies, Communication and Robotics (pp. 1-6). https://doi.org/10.1109/STCR59085.2023.10396966
  5. Balmer, A. (2023). A sociological conversation with ChatGPT about AI ethics, affect and reflexivity. Sociology, 57(5), 1249-1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231169676
  6. Baum, S. D. (2017). Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence. AI & SOCIETY, 35(1), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0760-1
  7. Beheshti, A., & Kerridge, I. (2025). Understanding the artificial intelligence revolution and its ethical implications. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 22(3), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10427-6
  8. Benefo, E. O., Tingler, A., White, M., Cover, J., Torres, L., Broussard, C., Shirmohammadi, A., Pradhan, A. K., & Patra, D. (2022). Ethical, legal, social, and economic (ELSE) implications of artificial intelligence at a global level: A scientometrics approach. AI and Ethics, 2, 667-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00124-6
  9. Boden, M. A. (2018). Artificial intelligence: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199602919.001.0001
  10. Cao, X., & Yousefzadeh, R. (2023). Extrapolation and AI transparency: Why machine learning models should reveal when they make decisions beyond their training. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 205395172311697. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231169731
  11. Carmody, J., Shringarpure, S., & Venter, G.V. (2021). AI and privacy concerns: A smart meter case study. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 19(4), 492-505. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2021-0042
  12. Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
  13. Chuang, C., Chang, A., Chen, M., Selvamani, M. J. P., & Shia, B. (2022). A worldwide bibliometric analysis of publications on artificial intelligence and ethics in the past seven decades. Sustainability, 14(18), Article 11125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811125
  14. Colonna, L. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the Internet of health things: Is the solution to AI privacy more AI? SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3838571
  15. Constantinescu, M., & Crisp, R. (2022). Can robotic AI systems be virtuous and why does this matter? International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(6), 1547-1557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00887-w
  16. Diallo, S. Y., Shults, F. L., & Wildman, W. J. (2020). Minding morality: Ethical artificial societies for public policy modeling. AI & SOCIETY, 36(1), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01028-5
  17. Dignum, V. (2022). Responsible Artificial intelligence–From principles to practice. SIGIR Forum/ACM SIGIR Forum, 56(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582524.3582529
  18. Erman, E., & Furendal, M. (2022). The global governance of artificial intelligence: Some normative concerns. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 9(2), 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2020-0046
  19. Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.
  20. Floridi, L. (2019). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833635.001.0001
  21. Fossa, F., & Sucameli, I. (2022). Gender bias and conversational agents: An ethical perspective on social robotics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00376-3
  22. Ghosh, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) and ethical concerns: A review and research agenda. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), Article 2551809. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2551809
  23. Gill, K. S. (2020). Ethics of engagement. AI & SOCIETY, 35(4), 783-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01079-8
  24. Guan, H., Dong, L., & Zhao, A. (2022). Ethical risk factors and mechanisms in artificial intelligence decision making. Behavioral Sciences, 12(9), Article 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12090343
  25. Hartwig, T., Ikkatai, Y., Takanashi, N., & Yokoyama, H. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence ELSI score for science and technology: A comparison between Japan and the US. AI & SOCIETY, 38(4), 1609-1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01323-9
  26. Hermann, E. (2021). Leveraging artificial intelligence in marketing for social good–an ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(1), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04843-y
  27. Huang, C., Zhang, Z., Mao, B., & Yao, X. (2023). An overview of artificial intelligence ethics. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 4(4), 799-819. https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.2022.3194503
  28. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
  29. Kamila, M. K., & Jasrotia, S. S. (2023). Ethical issues in the development of artificial intelligence: Recognizing the risks. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 41(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-05-2023-0107
  30. Köbis, N., Bonnefon, J., & Rahwan, I. (2021). Bad machines corrupt good morals. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(6), 679-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01128-2
  31. Matyashova, D. (2022). Malicious use of artificial intelligence discussed in the framework of the XIII International IT-Forum. In Proceedings of the 13th International IT-Forum.
  32. Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023). Fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in artificial intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review. Computers and Education. Artificial Intelligence, 5, Article 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152
  33. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
  34. Narayanan, D., Nagpal, M., McGuire, J., Schweitzer, S., & De Cremer, D. (2023). Fairness perceptions of artificial intelligence: A review and path forward. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2210890
  35. Oladoyinbo, T. O., Olabanji, S. O., Olaniyi, O. O., Adebiyi, O. O., Okunleye, O. J., & Alao, A. I. (2024). Exploring the challenges of artificial intelligence in data integrity and its influence on social dynamics. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 18(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i2601
  36. Onitiu, D. (2022). The limits of explainability & human oversight in the EU Commission’s proposal for the Regulation on AI- a critical approach focusing on medical diagnostic systems. Information & Communications Technology Law, 32(2), 170-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2022.2116354
  37. Qian, Y., Siau, K. L., & Nah, F. F. (2024). Societal impacts of artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal, and governance issues. Societal Impacts, 3, Article 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socimp.2024.100040
  38. Rajaonah, B., & Zio, E. (2022). Social robotics and synthetic ethics: A methodological proposal for research. International Journal of Social Robotics, 15(12), 2075-2085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00874-1
  39. Robles, P., & Mallinson, D. J. (2023). Artificial intelligence technology, public trust, and effective governance. The Review of Policy Research, 42(1), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12555
  40. Rodogno, R. (2016). Ethics and social robotics. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(4), 241-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9412-2
  41. Ryan, M., Antoniou, J., Brooks, L., Jiya, T., Macnish, K., & Stahl, B. (2021). Research and practice of AI ethics: A case study approach juxtaposing academic discourse with organisational reality. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00293-x
  42. Santhoshkumar, S. P., Susithra, K., & Prasath, T. K. (2023). An overview of artificial intelligence ethics: Issues and solution for challenges in different fields. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Capsule Networks, 5(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.36548/jaicn.2023.1.006
  43. Sheikh, S. (2021). Ethics of AI. In Understanding the role of artificial intelligence and its future social impact. IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4607-9.ch007
  44. Shen, Y. (2023). The ethical dilemma of artificial intelligence and its construction of moral responsibility. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 5(14). https://doi.org/10.25236/fsst.2023.051411
  45. Shimpo, F. (2020). The importance of ‘smooth’ data usage and the protection of privacy in the age of AI, IoT and autonomous robots. Global Privacy Law Review, 1(1), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020006
  46. Stark, L. (2023). Breaking up (with) AI ethics. American Literature, 95(2), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1215/00029831-10575148
  47. Waelen, R. (2022). Why AI ethics is a critical theory. Philosophy & Technology, 35, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00507-5
  48. Wamba, S. F., & Queiroz, M. M. (2021). Responsible artificial intelligence as a secret ingredient for digital health: Bibliometric analysis, insights, and research directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(6), 2123-2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10142-8
  49. Wang, X., Huang, J., Tian, Y., & Wang, F. (2024). AGI in metaverse for smart cities and societies: A cyber physical social approach. In Proceedings of the 2024 Australian & New Zealand Control Conference (pp. 61-66). https://doi.org/10.1109/ANZCC59813.2024.10432879
  50. Watney, M. (2024). Privacy and personal information protection by social media companies in an AI era. European Conference on Social Media, 11(1), 266-272. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecsm.11.1.2089
  51. Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., Dihal, K., & Cave, S. (2019). Ethical and societal implications of algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence: A roadmap for research. Nuffield Foundation.