Research Article

A Workshop on Social Media Apps for Year-10 Students: An Exploratory Case Study on Digital Technology Education in Regional Australia

William Guo 1 * , Wei Li 1
More Detail
1 School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, North Rockhampton, AUSTRALIA* Corresponding Author
Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(4), October 2022, e202222, https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/12237
Published: 16 July 2022
OPEN ACCESS   1975 Views   1471 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

A designated hands-on workshop on social media apps was conducted for two groups of Year-10 students from three schools in or near Rockhampton, an outer regional city in Australia, before the COVID-19 pandemic. It was hosted in a computer laboratory on the Rockhampton campus of the Central Queensland University of Australia. Statistical analyses of the students’ responses to the interactive practices during the workshop indicated that social media apps were widely used among the school students living in Australian regional communities, but their general digital literacy seemed below the educational goals for Year-10 students required in the national digital technologies curriculum (DTC). The encouraging sign was that some students expressed a genuine desire and interest in learning more digital technologies and creating purposeful digital applications. In Australia, however, there is no national specialist DTC for students in Years 11 and 12. Hence, it may be worthwhile to consider designing and implementing advanced national specialist digital curriculum for senior students in Years 11 and 12 who are true lovers of digital technologies. Some thoughts on improving STEM education outcomes in secondary schools in regional areas are also shared.
Keywords: digital technology education, social media apps, digital literacy, digital technology curriculum, secondary schools in regional communities

CITATION (APA)

Guo, W., & Li, W. (2022). A Workshop on Social Media Apps for Year-10 Students: An Exploratory Case Study on Digital Technology Education in Regional Australia. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(4), e202222. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/12237

REFERENCES

  1. ACARA. (n. d.). The Australian curriculum: Digital technologies (version 8.4) for Year 9 & Year 10. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/technologies/digital-technologies/
  2. AIHW. (2004). Rural, regional and remote health: A guide to remoteness classifications. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural-remote-australians/guide-to-remoteness-classifications/summary
  3. Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), Article 2TOT2.
  4. Courtney, L. & Anderson, N. (2010). Do rural and regional students in Queensland experience an ICT ‘turn-off’ in the early high school years? Australian Educational Computing, 25(2), 7-11.
  5. Dadpour, R., & Law, L. (2022). Understanding the ‘region’ in COVID-19-induced regional migration: Mapping Cairns across classification systems. Australian Geographer. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2022.2059128
  6. Daniela, L., & Lytras, M. D. (2019). Educational robotics for inclusive education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24, 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9397-5
  7. Duncan-Howell, J. (2012). Digital mismatch: Expectations and realities of digital competency amongst pre-service education students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 827-840. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.819
  8. Durak, H. Y., Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Yilmaz, R. (2017). Examining the relationship between digital game preferences and computational thinking skills. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(3), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6205
  9. Fraser, S., Beswick, K., & Crowley, S. (2019). Responding to the demands of the STEM education agenda: The experiences of primary and secondary teachers from rural, regional and remote Australia. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 5(1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2019.62
  10. Guo, W., Li, W., Dodd, R., & Gide, E. (2021). The trifecta for curriculum sustainability in Australian universities. STEM Education, 1(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2021001
  11. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
  12. Kirginas, S. (2022). Improving students’ narrative skills through gameplay activities: A study of primary school students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(2), ep351. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11526
  13. Li, Y., Hibbard, R. N., Sercombe, P. L. A., Kelk, A. L., & Xu, C. Y. (2021). Inspiring and engaging high school students with science and technology education in regional Australia. STEM Education, 1(2), 114-126. https://10.3934/steme.2021009
  14. Marín-Díaz, V., Sampedro, B., & Figueroa, J. (2022). Augmented reality in the secondary education classroom: Teachers’ visions. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(2), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11523
  15. Memik, E., & Nikolic, S. (2021). The virtual reality electrical substation field trip: Exploring student perceptions and cognitive learning. STEM Education, 1(1), 47-59. https://10.3934/steme.2021004
  16. Morris, J., Slater, E., Fitzgerald, M.T., Lummis, G. W., & van Etten, E. (2021). Using local rural knowledge to enhance STEM learning for gifted and talented students in Australia. Research in Science Education 51(Suppl. 1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9823-2
  17. Murphy, S. (2020). Science education success in a rural Australian school: Practices and arrangements contributing to high senior science enrolments and achievement in an isolated rural school. Research in Science Education, 52, 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09947-5
  18. Murphy, S., MacDonald, A., Danaia, L., & Wang, C. (2019). An analysis of Australian STEM education strategies. Policy Futures in Education, 17(2), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318774190
  19. REEAG. (2019). National regional, rural and remote tertiary education strategy–Final report. Regional Education Expert Advisory Group. https://www.dese.gov.au/access-and-participation/resources/national-regional-rural-and-remote-tertiary-education-strategy-final-report
  20. Sirakaya, M., & Cakmak, E. K. (2018). The effect of augmented reality use on achievement, misconception and course engagement. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(3), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.444119
  21. Vichie, K. (2017). Higher education and digital media in regional Australia: The current situation for youth. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 27(1), 29-42.
  22. Wang, L. H., Chen, B., Hwang, G. W., Guan, J. Q., & Wang, Y. Q. (2022). Effects of digital game‑based STEM education on students’ learning achievement: A meta‑analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, ep26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00344-0
  23. Wang, M., Liu, R., Zhang, C., & Tang, Z. (2021). Daran robot, a reconfigurable, powerful, and affordable robotic platform for STEM education. STEM Education, 1(4), 299-308. https://10.3934/steme.2021019
  24. Wilson, S., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2013). Should I stay or should I go? Rural and remote students in first year university stem courses. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 23(2), 77-88.